Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Kyle on Sun Jul 01, 2007 8:12 pm
Hey all
Contracted to do some product shots of a new mic to be released
Would love to hear some decent C&C on these.
Used a shooting table, perspex based.
Tungsten left and right of camera bounced off white false ceiling above.
580ex on camera wound back 2 full stops faced up.
Lightsphere PJ with no dome attached.
1.
2.
3.
Yes, the WB is slightly off in the 2nd one..
Cheers! 
-

Kyle
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Penrith, nsw
by devilla101 on Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:58 pm
yep nice shots. Make the first 2 brighter to make the white, whiter like the last one.
-

devilla101
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:48 pm
- Location: Rockdale, Sydney, Australia
-
by Kyle on Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:30 am
Cheers mate
Just got word from the customer and his boss, They are wrapped, so I must be on the right track..
-

Kyle
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: Penrith, nsw
by big pix on Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:44 am
These shots are fine, on my screen they look a little flat, but some printing, reproduction houses prefer images that way...... good work
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by bwhinnen on Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:46 am
Agree with Ron on the first two.
On the last one I'd be tempted to separate the 'fluffy ball' for want of the correct term, out a bit as well...
-

bwhinnen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
- Location: Cornubia, Brisbane
-
by poompy on Mon Jul 02, 2007 9:56 am
devilla101 wrote:yep nice shots. Make the first 2 brighter to make the white, whiter like the last one.
yeh i gotta agree, i had a play with the first one in PS
adjusted the curves to boost the white and it does look better, however you have heard back from the the client so as long they are happy that is all that matters.
-

poompy
- Member
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:41 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
by byrt_001 on Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:54 pm
Hi
the first one looks good!
-

byrt_001
- Member
-
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 10:54 pm
- Location: beatifuloutback,carnarvon. wa
-
by sirhc55 on Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:21 pm
Kyle - nice work.
A few pointers:
In #1 shoot portrait as it gives more usable pixels plus there needs to be more detail on the front face.
#2 - the highlight area is very good but the table stand lacks some detail.
#3 - This is a little more detailed. The grip for the mic could have been used for holding the mic as opposed to the white block. Again the detail in the mic is great but there is no detail in the wind shield or holder. Depending on the client requirement I would have cut in much closer to show the main products and only part of the case. The case can be shot solo and inserted in a smaller box as an insert.

Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by Oz_Beachside on Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:29 am
how about some close ups? sell the viewer, the textures on the handle, the ergonomics showing that this product is now some el cheapo ebay-o.
what does it look like when in use? set the mindset of the viewer, so its like they already know what it looks like in their hand, a top view?
and lastly, possible consider a hand model, depending on your client (and ultimately their's), a appropriate hand model (male and or female) may show that the mic fits in someones hand... again, all feedback in line with product positioning / marketing / human mindset, not feedback on the pics... 
-

Oz_Beachside
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2227
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|