Look up!

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Look up!

Postby stubbsy on Sat Jul 07, 2007 2:00 pm

These are two "outtakes" from my (soon to be) 13 part NZ series. Both are fisheye shots of ceilings. They won't be everyone's cup of tea, but I'm pleased with them so thought I'd share. Click a pic to see it larger.

This one is at the beautifully preserved Canterbury Provincial Council Chambers in Christchurch.

Image


There's an interesting story to this second one taken at Christ Church Cathedral. Basically you take the shot by lying flat on your back on the floor with the camera literally sitting on your face and pointing straight up. At the cathedral they have a volunteer whose job seems to be to ensure people don't interrupt the church service and to solicit donations if you want to take pics. So there I was lying on the floor taking the shot. When I finished he came up to me and said something along the lines of "in all my years here watching people take photos I've never seen anyone lie on the floor and take a photo of part of the ceiling". I explained I was using the fisheye lens and showed him the image on the back of the camera. He looked up at the ceiling then back at the image, shook his head and said "I've never really noticed what the ceiling looks like until now" :lol:

Image
Last edited by stubbsy on Sat Jul 07, 2007 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby BT*ist on Sat Jul 07, 2007 2:16 pm

Love the symmetry of the first one - very cool indeed. In the second one, the wooden beams dominate and I don't think it's as strong an image. Nice story, too :D
Pentax istDS+K10D. Pentax 50mm f1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, Kit Lenses. http://www.redbubble.com/people/berndt2
User avatar
BT*ist
Senior Member
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 8:38 am
Location: London, United Kingdom

Postby macka on Sat Jul 07, 2007 2:45 pm

Peter, I quite like #2, but I think it would be stronger in portrait orientation, with the current RHS at the bottom.

#1 isn't as interesting for me, I like being able to see more of the room as in #2.

Cheers
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby Trieu on Sat Jul 07, 2007 2:56 pm

Nice weird angle :)

If only I had a fish eye lens too.
Cheers,
Trieu
30D and TWO L's
User avatar
Trieu
Member
 
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Sydney's West Canon 30D

Postby stubbsy on Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:06 pm

macka wrote:Peter, I quite like #2, but I think it would be stronger in portrait orientation, with the current RHS at the bottom.


Thanks Kris - don't know why that didn't occur to me. Much better.

Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby SteveGriffin on Sat Jul 07, 2007 3:24 pm

More beautiful work from the house of Stubbsy. I am particularly impressed with the 2nd version of #2.

I would never be game to try a shot like that simply because I am sure I wouldn't survive the experience of the church roof caving in on me as I stepped inside :lol:
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
User avatar
SteveGriffin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Rochedale Brisbane

Postby ATJ on Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:51 pm

Peter,

#2 is much better in portrait and I prefer it to #1.
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Postby macka on Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:53 pm

stubbsy wrote:Thanks Kris - don't know why that didn't occur to me. Much better.


Much better indeed. Very nice. Bring on Part 13!
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby Old Bob on Sat Jul 07, 2007 6:12 pm

I really love the ceilings of these magnificent buildings, the design and workmanship are awesome. I recall, lying on the floor, in Dublin Castle, wishing I had a fish eye. Great shots as usual, Stubbsy.

Bob
User avatar
Old Bob
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 11:18 pm
Location: Parkes NSW

Postby Bluebell on Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:46 pm

I also love the fish eye lens photo portrait style. I guess because that's the way you would normally view it, i.e walking down the aisle of the church rather than from side on. It bothers me that the "volunteer" had never noticed the ceiling before though. Surely that's the most beautiful part of a cathedral. They are designed to lift your eyes upwards.
User avatar
Bluebell
Member
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:56 pm
Location: The Gap Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques