

NUDE Bird..... careful nakednessModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
NUDE Bird..... careful nakednesslooks like I have been putting the wrong sort of bird pix's up for comment...... so here is one I shot a while back..... hope this shot is more to everyones taste......
![]() ![]() Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Nice pic.
Just spoiled by too many pussies. ![]() TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
LMAO.....i am NOT touching that!! Great pic.....nice natural looking image!!
I resisted looking at this thread, thinking 'i'm not going to be caught out....'
Glad I have no self control now. I like the image. Don't know how much the cats add to it, but the skin tones and lighting are really spot on. Nice. ![]() 2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc
http://www.awbphotos.com.au
Lovely image Bernie love the play between the cat and the model looking up. Ideally the foreground pussy(hope i'm being specific enough
![]() ![]() ![]() cheers marco
thanks to the brave 4 who left a comment......... I have nothing to say to the other 128 lookers.........
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Ha! Make that the brave 5 Bigpix!.
![]() This is a lovely, natural and tasteful photo. I wonder what the lady and the cat on the left were looking at with their almost identical blue eyes? If you cropped the out of focus foreground cat out, you get a much stonger photo in my humble opinion. Well done! Cheers Graham
Yeah I'd lose the pussy... waaaaaaay too much fur if you ask me..
![]() The image isn't bad... but it could be improved by perhaps healing or cloning out wrinkles at her waist as they are a little distracting.. the peacock feathers while a nice touch are also postioned a little in the wrong spot as it kinda looks like she is sprouting them from her back.. still its lovely and I am sure that the lady concerned is stoked with it... ![]() The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
![]()
thanks to more brave soles...... I shot this image over 25 years ago.... with a metz flash in a brolly...... using a h/blad and transparency
EDIT: just did a recount make that over 33 years ago........ Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
So I'm guessing she doesnt look like that no more then.... which would make this image all the more important to her now I would imagine... its held up well... you won't see many of our digi images holding their quality for that many years I bet... transparencies rock...!! The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
![]()
Bernie,
I was going to comment that you'd gotten a real retro feel with this one, but seeing as it was shot in the 70s, it probably had a modern feel to it at the time. Note that the "Views" count is rather misleading. It will count every single view - including the multiple times you have opened it to see people's comments. Additionally, for every person that comments, there will be 2 views each time they comment - one to see it initially and one after their post. Don't get to hung up on the number of views.
I like the image - looks reminiscent of photos I have in my 1970s/80s photography books.
If we all got hung up on comments vs views, no-one would post images - I have had plenty of posts where there have been three comments and over 100 views! Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Sure, the foreground cat is distracting but i think there's enough interest in the rest of the image to keep it out of mind. Great image and a nice candid.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Previous topic • Next topic
15 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|