I’m sure that there will be constructive comment for me to dwell on



DecisionModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
22 posts
• Page 1 of 1
DecisionI can’t make up my mind as to which image I prefer - with grain or soft!!
I’m sure that there will be constructive comment for me to dwell on ![]() ![]() ![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
with grain ....
soft is, well, tooo soft Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Grain for me. Very nice images, nevertheless.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Grain for mine... and I agree, the second is too soft. Nice image(s) though!
Pentax istDS+K10D. Pentax 50mm f1.4, Sigma 10-20mm, Tamron 90mm f2.8 macro, Kit Lenses. http://www.redbubble.com/people/berndt2
Chris,
Grain, without a grain of doubt. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Grain for me too.
Out of curoiusity how did you add the grain. Film Grain Filter or Add Noise in PS or some other??? ![]() Steve
------------------------------------------------------- So many things to do - so little time.
Grain for me too Chris.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Alien Skin B&W Modify grain. Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
soft........ with a hint of more contrast
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Hi Chris,
The one thing that we most often look for in an image is sharpness, it is a fact of life... our eyes want to see something of detail simply so they know they are focused properly on the subject. (This is something that I have considered often, simply because I have shot a lot of grainy film in my time, usually Kodak TMax 3200, usually rated at 2000). Grain provides us with something for our eyes to focus on... while we can see it we are happy even if the image is overall rather soft. Try this for an idea... duplicat an layer, apply a little gaussion blur (just a few pixels) and see if you like it soft... then add back in some monochromatic noise just to add a little texture to the image. See what you think of the image then! Hope this is a help... Ants
grain by a mile here but give Antsl's suggestion a go as well.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Grain for me too - if I have to choose. I'd like the grain a tad toned down, though, to make it look more natural/film like/old.
The softened version looks way too high-tech and doesn't suit the subject and colour. Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
Thanks to everyone for your input. Ants, I will have a play with your suggestion - thank you
![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
grain FTW - Brilliant shot BTW
Nikon D80, MB-D80, Nikon 50mm f/1.8, Nikon 17-55mm f/2.8, SB-800, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3
Various bits of borrowed/stolen glass/speedlights etc. - zero style or taste. http://harryfisherphotos.smugmug.com
Previous topic • Next topic
22 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|