Thanks all for the comments, especially yours Geoff. Yes, I agree the 1st is most probably a tad too sharp, it was sharpened but most probably no need to do so. These pro lens are in many ways too sharp but I suppose it's better to be too sharp and then soften things a little in
PS.
The second is my daughter carrying her little cousin around for about an hour and was most probably getting sick of me taking photos, but comments acknowledged in any case!
I think the 3rd was at 2.8 for a bit of variation and you're right, the depth of field is razor thin. Some like it, some don't. I do like these type of shots. (Anyone have a 135 F2 that I could borrow permanently?

)
Thanks again for the comments all.
Ozi