Is it just me or is the second shot a lost cause?


Lorne SunriseModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Lorne SunriseI caught this the other day as I was driving through Lorne (Great Ocean Rd). I wouldn't normally shoot directly into the sun but thought what the hey!
Is it just me or is the second shot a lost cause? ![]() ![]()
My opinion (and your mileage may vary): With these sorts of shots straight into the sun, you can sometimes make them work if you can hide the sun behind something and if you use a sequence of bracketed shots and some HDR software. If you have these as raw images, it would be worth trying the first as a sequence of 0, -2, -4 EV and then putting thru Photomatix. I think the dynamic range of directly into the sun in the 2nd is too much for any software to handle.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
First one is great - love the colours!
The second one looks like you just took a photo of a nuclear explosion. It' sjust missing the mushroom clouds Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
I reckon the second is a lost cause but the first more than makes up for it. Be great if you can rescue some detail form the darker areas - perhaps open multiple exposure versions of the RAW and then blend them over a low heat. Serves 4.
![]() Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Thanks guys. Unfortunately the shot was taken in jpeg mode so RAW bracketing is out.
I like the idea of bracketing and blending several shots together. I tried this once for a lightening shot and was pretty happy with the results. Manta stop your making me hungry!
Previous topic • Next topic
5 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|