This is an HDR merge of 5 images. I liked the light even though it was pretty much middle of the day.
UPDATE: I played around with he image a bit last night and like it a lot more now. First is original, second is after a play.


Cheers
John
Meetus Falls - UpdatedModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Meetus Falls - UpdatedMeetus Falls is in a forest reserve on the East Coast of Tasmania.
This is an HDR merge of 5 images. I liked the light even though it was pretty much middle of the day. UPDATE: I played around with he image a bit last night and like it a lot more now. First is original, second is after a play. ![]() ![]() Cheers John Last edited by johnd on Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Hi Laurie,
The monitor I use at home is very very bright and I think I've toned the brightness of the image down a bit too much as a result. The other thing it could be is that being an HDR, it tends to loose contrast. I'll try adding a touch of contrast in the vegetation to the side of the falls using curves to see if that make the image a bit mote punchy. I've added a couple zoomed out shots below to give an appreciation of the entire waterfall. ![]() ![]() Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
It's looks a nice spot John. One of the problems with HDR images I've found so far in my few attempts is that they can tend to look very unnatural. Your images however do look natural. Some people prefer this but others prefer the exaggerated HDR style. This image is the style that National Parks people would have in their brochures.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
Hi Tony, they are about 200 Kms. There's another 2 sets of falls within 20 or so Kms of these ones. I'll be going back there again soon to get some more shots of all 3 falls.
Hi Steve, I play around with HDR a bit and try different techniques in PPing. Ususally the HDR generation and tone mapping is just the first steps and I do a whole lot more in photoshop. Some images look good with an over the top HDR treatment and some work best with a more subtle treatment. It's all a lot of fun learning what works and what doesn't. Ohh, extra image added in original post. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|