
last pics from a set I finished processing during the week. I need to work on pose direction, but please, let lose on feeback, do you like these overall? any areas that need vast improvement?
#1

#2

#3

some happy snaps... C&C?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
some happy snaps... C&C?...joking gary
![]() last pics from a set I finished processing during the week. I need to work on pose direction, but please, let lose on feeback, do you like these overall? any areas that need vast improvement? #1 ![]() #2 ![]() #3 ![]()
All of these seem either too tightly cropped or not cropped tight enough for me, each as some part of the model off the edge of the image, if you not going to show all of her I'd prefer to be tighter, or more structured in some way.
Just a general comment, I'm not sure why but your images always seem softer then I believe they should be, and #1 and #3 definitely seem to fit the soft category (at least on my monitor). #1 Locket is distracting, composition awkward bits of legs in the background, missing part of her hair on the RHS, her arm on the LHS. The lighting on her face and her leg help create a nice 3d shape but I don't think the composition makes the best of good lighting. #2 LIghting and pose are ok (maybe if she was a little tiny bit more relaxed it would be even better) again its the composition that doesn't do it for me here. #3 The lighting feels a tad flat here, there is a bit of shape on her face, but I think you can do better. Hope I wasn't too harsh, and I'm no model photographer to take it all with a big pinch of salt.
I think a lot of my poor crops, are due to an annoying magnify eye piece I put on one of my cameras. I often shoot with two, one with standard eye piece.
the magnifier one, you cant see the whole viewfinder at once, so I miss edges (also through specs....) think I'll take it off, and find the original eye piece... as for softness, I'll post a 300DPI, it could be my 72 DPI files, then hosted on pbase, losing quality at each step??? thanks
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|