

B & W - Tick or flickModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
B & W - Tick or flickPlaying with two shots from the last harbour walk that were in my too hard pile. Decided to play with B & W on them. What do you think?
![]() ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
nice treatment with both....... the buildings in the background of the first I find a tad of a distraction...... maybe a slightly tighter crop, or show more buildings
maybe a slight vertical correction on the second as camera is looking up Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Peter - the 2nd shot is great, not so sure about the first though. As said, the buildings in the b/g are somewhat distracting.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
I like both and feel your B&W transforms are very nice indeed. Perhaps cloning out the modern buildings in the first would add more olde-worlde charm to the image.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
I like the first one, but can see the point a few have made re the buidlings. What about darkening the units on right and buildings and some selective gaussian blur just to take the edge off. not sure how much you'd need to cover as just one blurry section would look a little funny,
If youre anything like me i'll spend an hour playing around and then when i reopen the original almost always prefer it with just some levels adjustment! Robert
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|