Page 1 of 1
Blood Red Orange - Eclipse Images

Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:59 pm
by Cre8tivepixels
Here is my take on tonight.thanks for looking:D
Taken with my 400mm 2.8 Nikkor
Cheers
Dan

Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:02 pm
by Yi-P
Great series!! I love them!


Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:06 pm
by losfp
Good one Dan!!!
I only thought about doing a squence after the fact, so mine were really hard to line up, and I gave up
Very cool sequence. Probably the only thing I would do is to colour correct the 2nd shot so that it matches the other moons in the bottom left, otherwise perfect


Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:07 pm
by Pehpsi
Shit yeah! Top work...

Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:29 pm
by ozczecho
Mate...awesome...this works....

Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:46 pm
by jethro
Great stuff Dan. Epitomises the event!
Jethro

Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:47 pm
by BT*ist
Brilliant sequence... though I'll admit I'm a little peeved that every single one of the component moons you took looks better than any single shot I took tonight. Oh, well.


Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:47 pm
by NJ
bloody awesome! looks like u had a nice clear night, i wasnt so lucky.

Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:49 pm
by Cre8tivepixels
Thanks guys, i took out my 'hardly' used 400 mm cleaned it up and wow, its still one of my sharpest lenses, i am going to do some day shooting with it, the backgrounds on 2.8 look amazing!!
Dan

Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:51 pm
by blacknstormy
What a fantastic series
And how cool was that moon- looked at the sky more than I looked at the ball at tennis .... at least it gave me an excuse for my shitty tennis
Love it


Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:55 pm
by Chad
Very well done


Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 10:58 pm
by chrisk
one of the best eclipse series' i have seen. great work.
when you switch to canon, we need to talk about that lens.


Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:01 pm
by Cre8tivepixels
Rooz wrote:one of the best eclipse series' i have seen. great work.
when you switch to canon, we need to talk about that lens.

Lol i am a turncoat....staying put now with the new bodies....cant wait to whack that lens on a D3 with 3200 ISO........lol
Dan

Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:05 pm
by jethro
Dan the 300D sounds very good to me as well. Im a little dissapointed in he frame rate . But it will do for me
Jethro

Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:07 pm
by Matt. K
Like a string of pearls. Excellent!

Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:15 pm
by norbs
Oh dear. I thought I was only ripping off NASA.
Will get rid off it Dan if you object.

Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:24 pm
by Cre8tivepixels
LOL did you do the same thing?
I saw this layout years ago......never had the right thing to do it with, this eclipse seemed perfect...whats the reference to NASA mean?


Posted:
Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:33 pm
by norbs
Cre8tivepixels wrote:LOL did you do the same thing?
I saw this layout years ago......never had the right thing to do it with, this eclipse seemed perfect...whats the reference to NASA mean?

I saw a similar pic on NASA today at some stage researching where it would be best to take the photos from.
As it turned out, not where there were 20 other people with PnS cameras firing flashes like cracker night.

Posted:
Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:07 am
by Big V
Both of you have done a good job both with the images and the display of the sequence - but if I may offer some advice, you have placed the totally eclipsed moon at the end of the sequence where it should be placed before the moon came out of the eclipse.. Astronomers will notice this straight away.

Posted:
Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:55 am
by Cre8tivepixels
Big V wrote:Both of you have done a good job both with the images and the display of the sequence - but if I may offer some advice, you have placed the totally eclipsed moon at the end of the sequence where it should be placed before the moon came out of the eclipse.. Astronomers will notice this straight away.
I didn't take the image for "astronomers' i took if for me


Posted:
Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:27 am
by norbs
Big V wrote:Both of you have done a good job both with the images and the display of the sequence - but if I may offer some advice, you have placed the totally eclipsed moon at the end of the sequence where it should be placed before the moon came out of the eclipse.. Astronomers will notice this straight away.
I was bored 20 minutes into it. I wasnt standing around for another 80 minutes to get the full cycle.


Posted:
Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:42 am
by Willy wombat
great series Dan - very good

Posted:
Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:52 pm
by Rainey
Terrific! Absolutely spot on.

Posted:
Wed Aug 29, 2007 1:19 pm
by Killakoala
Fantastic work fellas.

Posted:
Wed Aug 29, 2007 1:21 pm
by Travy
love the series.
well done!!