
Does it work? What do Brisbanians think? It looked like a beautiful modern city to me, full of contrast...
Cheers
Steffen.
BrisbaneModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
BrisbanePlain and simple, as seen from Mt Coot-tha look-out:
![]() Does it work? What do Brisbanians think? It looked like a beautiful modern city to me, full of contrast... Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
It is a pretty city.. as far as cities go that is... but I don't think that your image is doing it justice... perhaps because its mono maybe... I think I would like to see it in colour...
![]() The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but it's still on the list...
![]()
I like it, and I like the treatment too.
I think I'd like to see some of the trees in the foreground cropped out; maybe get rid of about half of them? (I'll lend you my chainsaw) g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Steffen,
I like the treatment you gave the image as well. Second vote for a crop at the bottom as well. Cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
The trees shouldn't be missed. It's only the Mt Coot-tha Botanical Gardens..
Knowing what the colours actually are, I must say I really like this version Steffen. It's quite different. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Thanks for the replies, everyone!
Sue, colour wouldn't have worked in this case - there hardly was any. The shot was taken in the mid-day haze, and looked really washed out. Mono was the only way to rescue it. Next time I'm in Brisbane I'll try to catch some quality light. I obtained the chainsaw plugin for Aperture, this is the result: ![]() Which do you like better? Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
depends what you're going for. Personally, I think the first pic has too many trees trying to compete for attention...it makes it not look so 'modern' and almost like the buildings are pee wee in comparison to the trees.
I think the 2nd pic is better if you want to emphasise the city but it all depends on what you want out of the shot. Do you want Brisbane to be a green city?
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|