Angry skies.

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Angry skies.

Postby norbs on Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:09 pm

Would like some feedback on this shot please.

Image

It looked so much better in real life. I suppose the limit of the cameras dynamic range is the problem. By my eye the sunset was alot more orange, and the clouds alot more bluey grey. Oh well.
norbs
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: -30.940579 144.421865

Postby chrisk on Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:24 pm

i think it may have worked better if you metered off the sky to the left where it's darker. you probably would have blown the sun on the right but the image would have been alot brighter and probably captured the colour of the sky/ cloud a little better.

it was a beautiful sky tonite. i;'m glad someone grabbed a shot of it.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby blacknstormy on Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:36 pm

Norbs - not sure if this is what you meant????

Image

If you would like this version removed, I'll take it off straight away, but this is how I interpreted what you said ..... selective dodge of highlights and midtones, increased saturation and a layer with orange where the sunset was ...... I really wanted to bring out the detail of the reflections and also in the trees on the edge of the water to give the shot a lift.

I love this shot - beautiful composition :)
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby norbs on Wed Sep 19, 2007 11:32 am

blacknstormy wrote:Norbs - not sure if this is what you meant????

If you would like this version removed, I'll take it off straight away, but this is how I interpreted what you said ..... selective dodge of highlights and midtones, increased saturation and a layer with orange where the sunset was ...... I really wanted to bring out the detail of the reflections and also in the trees on the edge of the water to give the shot a lift.

I love this shot - beautiful composition :)


Wow, I'm nearly tempted to replace my Flickr photo with that version. It certainly is more like what I saw, but, and I know I am going to get slaughtered here,I reckon its a bit too much PP. But thanks anyway, it certainly brings the shot to life.
norbs
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: -30.940579 144.421865

Postby blacknstormy on Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:06 pm

am going to get slaughtered here,I reckon its a bit too much PP


Why would you get slaughtered ????? Maybe I did go a little too far, but it was fun playing ;)
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby norbs on Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:58 pm

blacknstormy wrote:
am going to get slaughtered here,I reckon its a bit too much PP


Why would you get slaughtered ????? Maybe I did go a little too far, but it was fun playing ;)


Well, the majority of the people on this forum are Pro PP. I take a more gently gently approach. I do as little as possible. partly because I don't have the PP skills, and partly because I don't think you should polish a turd. :) And, I remember the shite fight that went on with another member ages ago re. PP.

That said, I am in awe of the PP skills of some of the people here, and would never try and tell them what to do, its just that its not my thing.

Do you happen to have a large version of the above, I might do a little experiment on Flickr. :)
norbs
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: -30.940579 144.421865

Postby blacknstormy on Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:45 pm

No worries :)

[url]http://www.fototime.com/{CCD10F1F-1117-4BF5-91F6-1F5B3FA7FD48}/picture.JPG[/url]
And it definitely wasn't a turd ;)

just copy the bits between the url tags - that way you can actually get to the photo
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby norbs on Wed Sep 19, 2007 5:45 pm

blacknstormy wrote:No worries :)

[url]http://www.fototime.com/{CCD10F1F-1117-4BF5-91F6-1F5B3FA7FD48}/picture.JPG[/url]
And it definitely wasn't a turd ;)

just copy the bits between the url tags - that way you can actually get to the photo


Thanks very much. Will credit you with the polishing. Somewhat fitting given your user ID. :)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/norbography/1405384899/

Thats the link to the photo if you want to keep an eye on what people are saying.
norbs
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: -30.940579 144.421865

Postby Patrolman Pat on Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:54 pm

Great composition norbs. I like the way all the lines are draw the eye to the sunset. The PP version shows great skill and improves the picture IMO but I'm a bit with norbs on the polishing a turd (love that expression) analogy, not that the original is a turd.
Having said that, if I hadn't seen the original the PP version would be a contender for pic of the month for the mix of composition and colours, I really like it.
Patrolman Pat
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:35 am
Location: Sheidow Park SA

Postby Nigell on Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:22 pm

norbs wrote:
blacknstormy wrote:Norbs - not sure if this is what you meant????

If you would like this version removed, I'll take it off straight away, but this is how I interpreted what you said ..... selective dodge of highlights and midtones, increased saturation and a layer with orange where the sunset was ...... I really wanted to bring out the detail of the reflections and also in the trees on the edge of the water to give the shot a lift.

I love this shot - beautiful composition :)


Wow, I'm nearly tempted to replace my Flickr photo with that version. It certainly is more like what I saw, but, and I know I am going to get slaughtered here,I reckon its a bit too much PP. But thanks anyway, it certainly brings the shot to life.


I would agree with that assessment norbs. But it is on the right path.
User avatar
Nigell
Member
 
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 9:24 pm
Location: Melbourne CBD


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques