Angry skies.

A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
https://www.dslrusers.com/
blacknstormy wrote:Norbs - not sure if this is what you meant????
If you would like this version removed, I'll take it off straight away, but this is how I interpreted what you said ..... selective dodge of highlights and midtones, increased saturation and a layer with orange where the sunset was ...... I really wanted to bring out the detail of the reflections and also in the trees on the edge of the water to give the shot a lift.
I love this shot - beautiful composition
am going to get slaughtered here,I reckon its a bit too much PP
blacknstormy wrote:am going to get slaughtered here,I reckon its a bit too much PP
Why would you get slaughtered ????? Maybe I did go a little too far, but it was fun playing
blacknstormy wrote:No worries
[url]http://www.fototime.com/{CCD10F1F-1117-4BF5-91F6-1F5B3FA7FD48}/picture.JPG[/url]
And it definitely wasn't a turd
just copy the bits between the url tags - that way you can actually get to the photo
norbs wrote:blacknstormy wrote:Norbs - not sure if this is what you meant????
If you would like this version removed, I'll take it off straight away, but this is how I interpreted what you said ..... selective dodge of highlights and midtones, increased saturation and a layer with orange where the sunset was ...... I really wanted to bring out the detail of the reflections and also in the trees on the edge of the water to give the shot a lift.
I love this shot - beautiful composition
Wow, I'm nearly tempted to replace my Flickr photo with that version. It certainly is more like what I saw, but, and I know I am going to get slaughtered here,I reckon its a bit too much PP. But thanks anyway, it certainly brings the shot to life.