Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by wendellt on Sun Oct 07, 2007 2:36 pm
Shot this fashion editorial for Jadore Mag in New York
the story was urban punk glam
the quickest shoot i ever did in my life organised it in 1 day shot within 1.5 hours, talk about a rush job
all avalailable light mixed in with sb800 on a modified fong sphere off camera flash
rest of the story here:
http://www.zeduce.org/images/shoot/sarah/sarah.htm
Stylist: Dominique Francon
Model: Sarah Collins
Hair: Linh Nguyen
Makeup: Eunabelle
Last edited by wendellt on Sun Oct 07, 2007 8:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by stubbsy on Sun Oct 07, 2007 2:56 pm
Wendell
I rarely comment on your work since I have nothing to say other than I admire your great talent, skill and passion for your work. Once day I hope you're rich if not famous.
Do you get any payment for jobs like this is or are they about exposure?
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by wendellt on Sun Oct 07, 2007 3:10 pm
hi peter
thankyou
fashion editorial is always done for free, and usually the tog or team produces the shoot, we fashion togs do it for exposure in a fashion mag, only a few mags lots of phogs so we all compete
building strong books with a definitive style and range is what this sort of thing is all about
the upside to this is that advertising industry people read see the mags and if they see a shoot that impresses them they will get the photographer to shoot an advertising campaign, and there lies the money
now its not the same for Vogue or Harpers for example those mags do pay the worlds top togs to shoot for them but it's no where near their standard rate
jadore mag is no where near Vogue
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by rflower on Sun Oct 07, 2007 3:28 pm
The front of the cars in the first one distract me a little, and looking at it for a while, the big dead space on the right doesn't do much for me either. Have you looked a squarish crop on the 1st?
You seem to have the lighting thing all worked out though in all of them
Russell Nikon D700 // 50 1.4 // 70-200 2.8 VRII // 24-120 f4// Tamron 90 // SB-800 // 70-300G I'm on Redbubble too ... http://www.redbubble.com/people/rflowerIf you can make one of my photos look better and you have the inclination ... please do so.
-

rflower
- Member
-
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:01 am
- Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne
-
by wendellt on Sun Oct 07, 2007 3:37 pm
thankyou for pointing that out
could of fixed that by recomposing so something would appear in the dead space on the right also the blue structure interferes with the hair
thanks for commenting
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Biggzie on Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:09 pm
I disagree, I think cropping #1 would take away from the punk - grunge angle of the pic.
The blue sections up by the hair I think could be darkened a little as could the back wall against her skin, but #1 i think is my pick from these 4.
All 4 are brilliant photos
Nunquam requîrere a aptus occãsiõ ad claudere sûrsum
-

Biggzie
- Member
-
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:51 am
- Location: Mt Gambier, SA
-
by rflower on Sun Oct 07, 2007 4:24 pm
I wasn't talking about all of the blue structure ... more from the middle of the 1st full support beam you can see, just past the front of the rear car. This way the rest of the supports and structure would still be available.
Russell Nikon D700 // 50 1.4 // 70-200 2.8 VRII // 24-120 f4// Tamron 90 // SB-800 // 70-300G I'm on Redbubble too ... http://www.redbubble.com/people/rflowerIf you can make one of my photos look better and you have the inclination ... please do so.
-

rflower
- Member
-
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:01 am
- Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne
-
by Alex on Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:05 pm
Somehow missed this post entirely...
Fantastic work as usual, Wendell! Love the framing, lighting and tones in No.3 - excellent!!
Alex
-

Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by the foto fanatic on Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:10 pm
Wendell
I'm sure you're tired of the constant adulation (or maybe not  ) but your efforts with direction and lighting are unique on this site.
Great effort, and as stubbsy inferred, you deserve to be rich and famous.
-

the foto fanatic
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
- Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane
-
by PiroStitch on Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:19 pm
The last one is more up to your usual standard - the pose, lighting and mood. The other 3 don't have as much impact particularly the 2nd one.
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|