IR in Ipswich

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

IR in Ipswich

Postby greencardigan on Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:24 am

Had a few days in Ipswich last week and tried out my IR filter again.

I did the PP on my laptop but they look a bit dark on my work PC.

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby big pix on Wed Oct 24, 2007 10:31 am

very nice....... but as you say a tad dark.......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby robert on Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:39 pm

You've definately got that strong "wood" effect happening, though they look quite dark on my monitor.

Any details Eg camera and filter (r72?)

I think with a bit more PP the first and third have the potential to really pop.

Robert
Robert
EOS 5D Mk II, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200f4 IS, 50 f1.8, 100 macro, 300D (IR Mod)
User avatar
robert
Member
 
Posts: 378
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:16 pm
Location: Sutherland, Sydney

Postby Biggzie on Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:52 pm

These actually look good on this monitor, but dark on my other monitor.

I like all of them, but the cathederal, if you crop the bottom off at the shadows, it kinda looks like its in the clouds.
Nunquam requîrere a aptus occãsiõ ad claudere sûrsum
User avatar
Biggzie
Member
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:51 am
Location: Mt Gambier, SA

Postby greencardigan on Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:54 am

robert wrote:Any details Eg camera and filter (r72?)

All taken with a D70 + 18-70 + R72. PP with CS3.
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques