Some birds

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Some birds

Postby losfp on Sat Oct 27, 2007 6:04 pm

Went out to Featherdale Wildlife Park today, and got a couple that I was satisfied with, more or less.

The 2nd and 3rd were tough to get because they were behind mesh - very challenging shooting conditions! You have to get your lens as close to the wire as possible, open up your aperture (unfortunately you lose DOF doing this) and try to make sure there is a good bit of distance between the bird and both you and the background...

Image
Image
Image
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Sat Oct 27, 2007 7:34 pm

losfp
Featherdale is a great venue for photography. Shooting birds through wire is not a satisfactory way to get pics, but sometimes it's the only way. I wish the managers of these places would install glass shooting ports or some other device that would alow us to get clear shots.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby ozimax on Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:05 pm

I can see the problems with #2,3, the first is tack sharp and a great shot of ol' kooka.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby Steffen on Sun Oct 28, 2007 3:12 am

Yes, you have to slam the lens right against the cage.

The one things that bothers me about those three shots is the missing eyes. Unless there is some favourable low sunlight striking the birds you have to use a bit of dialled down flash to put a bit of sparkle in the eyes.

I found (usually in hindsight) that the trick with zoo photography is to chase the light, not the cute animals.

Cheers
Steffen
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby zafra52 on Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:38 pm

I like the colours in the third image and the sharpness in the first. I find the second a bit soft.
User avatar
zafra52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4860
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby losfp on Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:25 pm

Steffen wrote:
The one things that bothers me about those three shots is the missing eyes. Unless there is some favourable low sunlight striking the birds you have to use a bit of dialled down flash to put a bit of sparkle in the eyes.

I found (usually in hindsight) that the trick with zoo photography is to chase the light, not the cute animals.


Yep - agree about the eyes. Trouble is there was a tradeoff between having the catchlights from the flash, vs having better contrast shooting without the flash through the mesh... Looking at my shots, I got the better, sharper shots without flash, so decided to use those ones.... Now if they were only in the open... ;)
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques