I'm not sure about this one.

The Black TreeModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
The Black TreePeter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: The Black TreeBut it looks like the first one isn't working either! I'm getting a 'post doesn't exist' message
![]() *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Re: The Black TreeDumb me - deleted the wrong post!
![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: The Black TreeTo be brutal (so unlike me
![]() ![]() *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Re: The Black TreeDoesn't work for me Peter, fails on the treatment, composition, just doesn't work Peter
Re: The Black TreeI like it - the ferns give it context, and the B&W makes it look 1940's or so.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Re: The Black TreeThe problem I have with this photo is that the tree doesn't stand out enough from the background. This may be a good candidate for selective colouring, Try restoring some colour in the ferns and the base below the tree.
__________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
Re: The Black TreeThanks for your comments gentlemen. Here's the colour version.
Phillip - I tried selective colour but it didn't work. ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: The Black TreeColour version much better, me reckons
![]() Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR 20" iMac Intel C2D Aperture 2.1 PS CS3 http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
Re: The Black TreeI agree with Phillip. It gets lost in the background as a B&W with the contrast given.
It does look OK in colour though. Regards Colin Regards Colin
Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
Re: The Black TreeI prefer the colour one Peter, but i thought I would try it out and you are right, selective colour wasn't much good.
I tried desaturating the greens and saturating the yellows and got this... ![]() __________
Phillip **Nikon D7000**
Re: The Black TreeThat's much better Peter, but it's still not one of your better shots. I do like the tree though, especially the contrast in textures from one side to the other.
I know you've got better shots from the weekend, and look forward to seeing some of them ![]() *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|