scottvd wrote:Gary-
Why'd you leave the car theft, meth, and fat people that Modesto is so well known for?
When we were there - 1992 - 1995 - Modesto was revered as a "safe" place to live. People used to revel in the fact that there was little in the way of crime being reported in the Bee. As compared with, for instance, The Chronicle. What they failed to realise was that while the incidence of crime was on the low side, that is an expectation from a city with a low population.
The actual rate of crime was about the same as in the Bay area, however.
We left 'cos I moved to somewhere pretty. DFW.

Except for a small area around 50 yards either side of the river, there's not too many places around Modesto where the word "pretty" could be used.
Mind you, the Gallo property isn't too bad.
We lived just off Standiford, in the block between McHenry and Tully.
(: I have a few friends that do IT work for Gallo..
Which is exactly what I used to do. Do any of them date back that far?
Thanks for the tips for photo #4 - how'd the other three look?
The B&W is nce, but it suffers from the mid afternoon winter sun. Shadows plus sunlight across the faces makes this a difficult one to use, with, I suspect, some of the areas on the faces blown. Might be a shot to redo, using some fill flash to help counter the sunlight.
I don't like how crooked the second one is. Knowing how few hills there are in the region

I think it probably needs major straightening. For the intended use, I don't know if the rear view of the groom will be practical.
Obviously you want the non-straight appearance of the first one. As a portrait of the couple I think it's nice, but the I prefer the fourth one as a nicer image ... more life, more relaxed ... seems less contrived.