Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by auxr8220 on Sat Mar 21, 2009 5:16 am
hey i popped in to a photographic store here in adelaide, was checking out there selection when i came across some filters that made images look really cool, like really strong orange sunsets and such. i walked out the door with a little bit of gear a cokin adapater, filter mount, and 2 filters. orange and a gradual natural grey. here is the natural grey in the mount on the camera  i did a bit of mucking around with them last night in my backyard. this one is me lying down shooting at the clouds, the gradual grey filter mix with the cir polarizer really brings out the blue in the sky  and these two are over my back fence using the orange filter.   all images are straight from the camera, just resized in photoshop down the track i will get a few more, it is great to try new things. i know i can add similar filters on PS, or lightroom. but i want to get the effect on the camera first.
-
auxr8220
- Member
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:54 pm
- Location: western suburbs, ADELAIDE
by Mr Darcy on Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:23 am
A time honoured technique. You might want to check out the graduated filters. These allow you to place the effect over only part of the image. Also Graduated ND (grey?) filters allow you to balance exposure if , for example, you have a bright sky but a dark foreground.
One thing to remember though. If you apply these in camera, you have lost colour information. There is no way to get back to natural
Greg It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
-

Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by auxr8220 on Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:34 am
thanks for the info mr darcy, i never thought about it like that to balance up a picture. this was just my first attempt at it. i am still exploring the world of photography, and i like to dibble and dabble in a little bit of everything.
-
auxr8220
- Member
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:54 pm
- Location: western suburbs, ADELAIDE
by Mr Darcy on Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:49 am
The world of filters can give you endless enjoyment. A couple of other ideas to try: A dark neutral density filter (e.g. ND8) can give you really long exposures for waterfalls. etc. I once used several stacked to take a 10 minute exposure of a busy freeway in the middle of the day. No cars were visible in the final photo as they were not in frame long enough to show. Won't work on Parramatta Rd in peak hour though Use a coloured filter on the lens. Use its complementary filter over a flash. The background will be weirdly coloured, but the foreground will look right. To reverse the effect, just take the filter off the camera.
Greg It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
-

Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by gstark on Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:58 am
As Greg says, this is a time honoured technique; you are about to start playing in some real fun waters. And Cokin is a great way to go too; you just need to buy the adapters to fit the different lenses that you have, as and when you acquire new glass. Try using the orange filter with your camera set to just shoot in B&W mode. Better yet, grab a yellow filter and shoot B&W.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by auxr8220 on Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:11 pm
someone on another photography forum said that these filters were a waste of time, and that all of this stuff can be done on the computer,
as mr darcy said, he put the ND filters ontop of each other to take a long exposure shot in daylight. i know that with my cameras and lens capabilitys no matter how small i make the f stops there is no way i can take a long exposed shot during the day.
-
auxr8220
- Member
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:54 pm
- Location: western suburbs, ADELAIDE
by chrisk on Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:23 pm
you cannot replicate grads on PC cos you are effectively altering the dynamic range captured by your camera. i have a close friend who uses cokin filters and we have tried recreating filter effects in PS. most of the coloured types can be replicated pretty easily but its nowhere near as much fun imo. getting it right "on location" is part, a very LARGE part, of the joy of photography.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by gstark on Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:56 pm
auxr8220 wrote:someone on another photography forum said that these filters were a waste of time, and that all of this stuff can be done on the computer,
And I might be tempted to suggest that that's not actually photography, but a post processing technique. Yes, there's a lot you can do on the computer, but if you can master getting the image that you want, in the camera, that's a lot less time you'll be spending on the computer trying to get the image that you want, as opposed to the time you can spend out in the field, actually taking photographs. I know what I'd rather be doing. 
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by auxr8220 on Sun Mar 22, 2009 3:21 am
yeah, that is what i said to him. i would rather get my shots right on the camera first then worry about post processing the images later.
when i have some time i will play around some more, right now trying to get sleep for the last day of clipsal500 is the main thing on my mind.
-
auxr8220
- Member
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:54 pm
- Location: western suburbs, ADELAIDE
by Mr Darcy on Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:33 am
auxr8220 wrote:someone on another photography forum said that these filters were a waste of time, and that all of this stuff can be done on the computer,
I know this has been more or less covered, but I have to ask the question: If it takes 10 seconds to put the filter on, as opposed 1 minute applying the filter in PP; just which is the waste of time? Yes applying the filter in PP has its uses: You don't have the right filter with you in the field or you just didn't think of that particular treatment at the time
Greg It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
-

Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|