Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Killakoala on Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:53 pm
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by aim54x on Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:26 pm
Nice to see more images from this mini meet..I am pretty sad that i was not able to go.
#1 and #2 dont do much for me, as I have previously mentioned in other posts...they are nice, but simply lack that extra
#3 is great, the lines work well and draw me into the image
#4 I really like this one, it would have to be my favourite of the bunch. You really have captured so much in this image, the erosion (good luck lasting 100yrs!!) and also the beauty of the landscape.
Great work there Steve, I look forward to seeing more pictures from this meet.
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by surenj on Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:57 pm
I generally agree with Cameron. #3 - the edge between sky and mountain appears to have a halo. If this is just a JPG effect that's ok but, if it's HDR, then that needs fixing. Currently it looks like the sky and mountain are from different scenes. #4 - I think you have done well to capture this in midday sun. I like the composition. Interesting observation about the erosion. Wonder how far those vertical supports go in to the ground... Perhaps the way to improve the first two would be have side lighting... but then that's not upto your control.... unless you had a pocket wizards firing strobes from another glider. BTW: The first one can be viewed two different ways. One of the ways, it looks a bit confusing as to the connection of the support to the glider! optical illusion sort of thing.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by zafra52 on Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:19 pm
I find all of them are excellent each one for different reason.
-

zafra52
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4857
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
- Location: Brisbane
by biggerry on Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:04 pm
The 800 wide version do not do those hanggliders justice, I recommend viewing the larger linked versions!nice ones! I like the perspective in the final image, somethign different! likelihood of it still standing in 20 years?
warranty job unless you had a pocket wizards firing strobes from another glider.
lol, i know what i woulda done if someone was strobing me whilst trying to jump/fly off that cliff 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by surenj on Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:17 am
biggerry wrote:lol, i know what i woulda done if someone was strobing me whilst trying to jump/fly off that cliff
Most wouldn't even notice as they would be trying to keep their pants dry. 
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by ozimax on Mon Oct 12, 2009 4:39 pm
Killakoala wrote:The bridge is supposed to last 100 years according to the propaganda on display at the bridge. But looking at the rate of erosion, what is the likelihood of it still standing in 20 years?
Nice images Steve. I have often thought about jumping off the cliff there at Stanwell Park in a hang glider. Fortunately, that's as far as I got. As a former RTA employee, I just hope that the bridge was built by contractors... 
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse) Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
-

ozimax
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5289
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
- Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|