Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by chrisk on Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:28 am
Just got s.back from a week away at currarong on the NSW sth coast and what a beautiful place it is. the weather was sublime for people photos, overcast all week but apart from one day there was no great skies to take advantage of. i took a shitload of shots and here are the first 4. all taken with the 24-70 and lee GND's. the first 2 are of the same rock and cant figure which one i like best. the second suffers from a bit of camera movement as the wave crashed around me. waist deep in water was tricky.     thanks for looking, your suggestions for improvement are welcome. PS: i know most people dont like the borders...take it as read that i realise not having borders will make these more appealing to some. i'm ttrying to get criticism on the shot itself to improve my landscaping skills. 
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by dawesy on Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:58 am
Of #1 and #2 I actually prefer #2. The isolation of the main rock as a result of the extra water covering the rocks bottom left makes it stronger for me, making it a more focused subject. I also like the slight movement that has come into the rock care of you being swamped, it adds to the movement and drama of the image to me, and hasn't hurt the background at all.
#3 is probably my favourite, again I like the strong solitary rock as a subject, and I think the sky here is really nice as well.
#4 is also delightful. Nice colours, nice contrast and good control of the bucket load of dynamic range in the scene.
-
dawesy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 pm
- Location: Roseville, Sydney
-
by tommyg on Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:47 am
 Everything dawesy said! #2 has a slightly surreal feeling to it - absolutely love it. Only thing is just below the rock there is a small dust bunny - either quick PP to remove, or could even crop a little further. (actually just checked the other images and needs to be cleaned on them as well #4 - only thing I would maybe attempt on this if you have the RAW file still - underexpose it slightly to drop the sun flare slightly, and then maybe merge (either manually in PS etc or via photomatix or similar) Cheers Tom
-
tommyg
- Member
-
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:36 am
- Location: Mawson Lakes, Adelaide
by chrisk on Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:50 am
thanks dawesy. just to clarify...there's actually 3 GND filters on the sunset one. 1.2/0.9/0.6 which is 9 stops. the 1.2 and 0.6 were at top of image. the 0.9 was around the middle. tommy, RE: #4 i agree 100%. regretfully my PP skills aren't up to that standard. although i am going to do a PS course very soon to try and help with that. layers do my head in.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by biggerry on Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:16 pm
i'm ttrying to get criticism on the shot itself to improve my landscaping skills
landscape shots are alot harder than they look in my opinion, whilst it is easy to get a half decent one that most people will go' wow' to, its hard to really nail both the awesome composition and appropriate PP treatment. The idea of nailing down a single subject within your scene is a very good option, however I find you still need that other element to lead the eye thru the scene. For this reason I really like #3, it has that really strong subject (the rock) but also has some leading lines (the flowing water) that leads the viewer thru the image and finally to the sky. I would like to see this shot as a pano, however without losign any of your foreground or sky I think ur PP is quite nice on the first few images, the contrasty punch works well with the cloudy scene currarong on the NSW sth coast
yes, very nice area, greenpoint and that area is certianly one of the better areas without all the tourists 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by bigsarg7 on Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:30 pm
Was your gear actually out in the rockpools? eg on tripod? did you manage to keep it all dry or did you use protective covers? wow, great idea, i know what i would like to do next time i'm down near the beach! would love to know if you did use protective gear if so what? or an explanation as to how you kept your gear nice and safe!!
2 x Fuji xt1,vg-xt1 grip, Fujinon xf 18-55mm 2.8-4, Fujinon xf 14mm, Fujinon 56mm 1.2.
-

bigsarg7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 667
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 2:11 pm
- Location: Goulburn Valley (Victoria, Australia)
by chrisk on Mon Feb 15, 2010 3:22 pm
bigsarg7 wrote:Was your gear actually out in the rockpools? eg on tripod? did you manage to keep it all dry or did you use protective covers? wow, great idea, i know what i would like to do next time i'm down near the beach! would love to know if you did use protective gear if so what? or an explanation as to how you kept your gear nice and safe!!
on a tripod. no protective gear. you just need to keep a close eye on the swell cos there are times that the waves came in about chest height in which case you gotta grab hold of the tripod and lift it over your head. needless to say rock spikes are a must.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by surenj on Mon Feb 15, 2010 7:16 pm
Standing ovation for risking your D700 and 24-70 for these shots!!! If you want to throw away your gear, either Gerry or myself will take them off you. no charge. I think the strongest is #4 but would need to tone the sun down a tad. Depending on how your camera handles highlights perhaps you have some detail there to recover in one of your brackets. The leading lines with rocks, trees in the distance make this the most balanced image IMHO. The others images are very appealing from a technical viewpoint but not as strong to stand on their own.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by wendellt on Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
3rd and fourth one screams beautiful mood
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by colin_12 on Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:56 pm
I like #3. It has nice movment in it for me. 
Regards Colin Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
-

colin_12
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: Hazelbrook
by DJT on Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:32 am
Awesome sunset, very nice indeed
-
DJT
- Member
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:29 pm
- Location: Werrington
by barry on Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:28 pm
Even though I like #4, I think #3 is the winner of the 4 with both great composition and great colour.
D700, 50 1.8, 14-24 2.8, 24-70 2.8, 70-200VR, 80-400VR, SB800 plus a lot of gadgets
-

barry
- Member
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 9:25 am
- Location: Emu Plains NSW
by glamy on Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:08 pm
I like #2 the best but none of them relly does it for me.
-

glamy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:38 pm
- Location: S/W Sydney- D70+D2X
by Aussie Dave on Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:03 pm
No. 3 is the clear winner from this bunch, for me. The composition and lighting on this is really nice.
The first two seem to have the main point of interest smack bang in the centre of the image, which I would have tried to take the shot with the rock to one side (though this may be a personal preference thing).
No. 4 is a nice photo but the blown highlight spoils it (for me). I would also have maybe taken one closer to the ground for a different perspective and had the horizon in the lower third of the image.
Love the sky in the 4th though....it looks wonderful !
Dave Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
-

Aussie Dave
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1427
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
- Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]
by chrisk on Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:43 pm
thanks for the feedback for those that took the time. 
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|