Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by ATJ on Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:43 pm
On the walk we saw quite a few sundews in the boggy areas on the side of the track. There were two species, Drosera spatulata and D. peltata. The former have a rosette sort of shape while the latter are upright with almost Hydra like leaves. The leaves have sticky hairs which attract insects to them. The insects get stuck and are broken down providing nutrients for the plant. This allows the plant to live in poor soil and still get the required nutrients. I think I like the look of the upright ones better, but the rosette ones are easier to photograph. I'm glad I got a shot with a flower, but I'm annoyed by the piece of grass in the background. All shots with D300, Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D, SB-800, collapsible soft box. Drosera spatulata Drosera spatulata Drosera peltata with flower. Drosera peltata
-

ATJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
-
by stubbsy on Tue Apr 13, 2010 10:08 pm
Fantastic work Andrew - #2 is my favourite and you've really brought these guys to life.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by surenj on Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:08 pm
#2 has a great 3D feel. How much is on camera flash (with softbox I assume) contributing to this shot?
Really love the waterdroplets and composition in #4.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by DebT on Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:08 pm
#4 for me - I like the upright , just enough light to make the moisture drops sparkle DebT
DebT "so many dreams - so little time "
-

DebT
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 812
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:58 am
- Location: Adelaide SA
by Matt. K on Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:37 pm
Andrew You really nailed those suckers! Those images are excellent! 
Regards
Matt. K
-

Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by biggerry on Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:15 pm
#2 has a great 3D feel.
I agree, the difference is quite pronounced between the first two images, the angled composition makes it soo much better imo! I love number 4, however i think it needs to be appreciated at full res to get the max effect of the droplets. Anotehr option would be to crop the OOF area and just work with the in focus droplets, ie remove the bottom and left portions of the frame. Nonetheless a eye catching image!
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by ATJ on Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:57 pm
stubbsy wrote:Fantastic work Andrew - #2 is my favourite and you've really brought these guys to life.
Thanks, Peter. surenj wrote:#2 has a great 3D feel.
Thanks, Suren. surenj wrote:How much is on camera flash (with softbox I assume) contributing to this shot?
All the lighting is coming from the soft box. It was shot at ISO 200, f/11 and 1/125s which would have been fine for full Sun, but it was overcast at the time and the soft box would have shaded it from even that. surenj wrote:Really love the waterdroplets and composition in #4.
They are actually droplets of sticky gunk from the plant itself which it uses to lure and trap insects. DebT wrote:#4 for me - I like the upright , just enough light to make the moisture drops sparkle
Thanks, Deb. biggerry wrote:#2 has a great 3D feel.
I agree, the difference is quite pronounced between the first two images, the angled composition makes it soo much better imo!
Thanks, Gerry, The trade-off is less of the image is sharp because of the shallow depth of field. biggerry wrote:I love number 4, however i think it needs to be appreciated at full res to get the max effect of the droplets. Anotehr option would be to crop the OOF area and just work with the in focus droplets, ie remove the bottom and left portions of the frame. Nonetheless a eye catching image!

-

ATJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
-
by biggerry on Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:11 pm
yep, that cropped version rocks imo The trade-off is less of the image is sharp because of the shallow depth of field.
true and I guess it depends on what the image is going to be used for comes into play here, however the two images together would work very well in a field guide of sorts!
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by surenj on Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:13 pm
Thanks for the lighting info Andrew.
That crop looks great! Nice eye for spotting that Gerry.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by colin_12 on Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:37 pm
These came out well Andrew. Nothing like kneeling in the mud for a good pic. 
Regards Colin Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
-

colin_12
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: Hazelbrook
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|