Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by surenj on Mon May 31, 2010 12:50 am
Went moonlighting with the sundance group. What a turn out on a Sunday evening. The moon did put on a small show as well. Definitely need a longer lens for this sort of thing. I think Bigpix was using a 500mm + 1.7 + 2.  I managed a few with my 17-85. I usually zoom with my feet but that's not possible with the moon apparently... Even without the moon, this is a magical place at night with the halogen lights (which must be at least a fwe thousand watts) It was good to finally meet Radar as well. For your C&C.   
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by big pix on Mon May 31, 2010 2:28 am
surenj wrote:Went moonlighting with the sundance group. What a turn out on a Sunday evening. I managed a few with my 17-85. I usually zoom with my feet but that's not possible with the moon apparently...
........ not unless you can walk on water..... 
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by wazonthehill2 on Mon May 31, 2010 9:10 am
Surenj We really could not call ourselves the moon dancers, could get all the wrong connetations
I like all the three shots you have posted here, three great perspectives, all holding different interest points.
Good captures in contrast and contenet
See you next time!
-

wazonthehill2
- Member
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:42 pm
- Location: Valentine Newcastle NSW Australia
by surenj on Mon May 31, 2010 9:26 am
wazonthehill2 wrote:We really could not call ourselves the moon dancers, could get all the wrong connetations  Perhaps.... from Wikipaedia The Moondancers are a fictional DC Comics team of radical pacifist terr0rist$. They first appeared in World's Finest Comics #295 (September 1983 ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moondancers
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by radar on Mon May 31, 2010 10:23 am
Hi Suren, great to finally have met you. 3rd would be my favourite. Second one is good but for me, but I would like to see a bit of space on the right, just a bit too tight for my taste on the 8 starting block. pacifist terr0rist$
Contradiction in terms?? Cheers, André
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
-

radar
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
- Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000
-
by biggerry on Mon May 31, 2010 10:38 am
surenj wrote:Even without the moon, this is a magical place at night with the halogen lights (which must be at least a fwe thousand watts)
nioce, no need to bring the lights eh? The last image is the one that stands out for me, the pano crop works very nicely and I would even go further and maybe shave a bit more off the bottom to separate the image into thirds..do this with the scrolling screen looks good at my end  The first image is very nice composition - but, the first hand rail into the water (on the right) breaks that leading line down to the main subject, the pump house. I know you could clone that out in a jiffy and lookign at the surrounds it would not be hard - however it does remove teh true representation of the scene surenj wrote:Went moonlighting with the sundance group. What a turn out on a Sunday evening.
great to see your getting out suren, the move up there will undoubtly improve your photography... 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by surenj on Mon May 31, 2010 5:49 pm
big pix wrote:........ not unless you can walk on water.....
Apparently even that's not enough. wazonthehill2 wrote:See you next time!
Definitely. Really enjoying hanging with the gang! Too bad about the lack of good food afterwards... But then one can't expect too much from a Sunday night though. radar wrote:Second one is good but for me, but I would like to see a bit of space on the right, just a bit too tight for my taste on the 8 starting block.
Thanks Radar, I will double check whether I cropped this one. I think I may have. biggerry wrote:nioce, no need to bring the lights eh?
I did take my flash though...also the green EL wire.... Just in case.... biggerry wrote:The last image is the one that stands out for me, the pano crop works very nicely and I would even go further and maybe shave a bit more off the bottom to separate the image into thirds..do this with the scrolling screen looks good at my end
point taken. biggerry wrote:The first image is very nice composition - but, the first hand rail into the water (on the right) breaks that leading line down to the main subject, the pump house. I know you could clone that out in a jiffy and lookign at the surrounds it would not be hard - however it does remove teh true representation of the scene
Interesting, although when I was composing this, I thought the break would add little more dynamic nature to it all. I am glad to hear your opinion on it though. Meh re: cloning. I try to do minimal PP these days. biggerry wrote:great to see your getting out suren, the move up there will undoubtly improve your photography...
Also, they post all their shots (no restriction on numbers) on the flickr group. So I get to check out all perspectives.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|