Thanks for everyone for taking time to comment.
zafra52 wrote:it gives the image
a sense or realism
Thanks Zafra. I have been removing less and less elements from images lately.
CraigVTR wrote:It snakes accross the forground, through the middle and then drags your eye in to the picture. I think it is great.
Craig, I just wished that I captured two frames (pano). I don't think I have much resolution left to print if I wanted to...
Bob G wrote:#4 is so close to being a fantastic shot with the dark top left and the lens flare being the only nits.
as this one has lost alot due to cropping...
Thanks BobG. I do have a lighter version part of the original bracket. I should be able to blend some of it back.
dawesy wrote:#1 is nice, but for me it just lacks a strong point of interest.
That's what I was thinking as well. Unfortunately I couldn't find any thing better suited at the time.
dawesy wrote:my high tech crop testing method
That is interesting. I never think of landcapes in square crop. I think this may work. Will have another look.
biggerry wrote:ano crop used appropriately

I have been seeing a little more pano lately. Perhaps I need to get into the habit of taking a couple of frames.
biggerry wrote:great to see you getting out there in the cold harsh mornings
Yep! Wore thongs to this one and I couldn't feel my feet for most of the time. I was afraid that I might catch frost bite. The sea temperature was warmer though!
aim54x wrote:I love the colours in #2, and in many ways it is my favourite, there is mystery to the image, almost non-photographic (but in a good way).
Cameron, I had so many if these on the day since I was hanging close to the water to warm my feet!!
dawesy wrote:A really nice ethereal image.
I was amazed myself at the difference that a few seconds exposure brings. Although this image suits the mood that morning perfectly. It was so very peaceful especially when I was far from the photogs yakking about the latest piece of equipment.
Jenno wrote:#2 confuses my eyes into thinking the image is horizon is crooked but it isnt.
I had to adjust this image so many times. Nearly all my pictures are crooked out of camera. Maybe that electronic level thing would be great to have if I get into a habit of using one. Would one of those simple spirit levels work for this axis?