Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by biggerry on Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:03 pm
Thanks to all who made it up in the miserable weather that we had! however one must seize the opportunity where ever possible and whilst the primary aim for me was gonna be star trails, waterfalls was more on the cards due to a minor issue with clouds  I certainly have enough waterfall shots now.. Cliche stuff at Leura Cascades..  more cliche stuff at wennie falls near the Darwins walk..  and of course a more of a overview shot of the lovely wennie falls..  another cliche pano...gee i have a few of these now ..  and something from greg/pams front yard... 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by Remorhaz on Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:23 pm
Up to your usual high standard Gerry. I really quite like #2 - it may be a cliche but it is very nicely done - I would have perhaps liked a little bit more on the top (but I don't know what was up there) #3 however really takes my fancy - not exactly sure why but I liked it when I first saw it and strangely at first I didn't feel like I was looking down at all - it wasn't till I studied it more that I tipped in (perhaps thats why I like it - got me looking for a while  )
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro SticksRodney - My Photo BlogWant: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
-

Remorhaz
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2547
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600
-
by colin_12 on Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:41 pm
Number 3 for me as well Gerry. That is a classic shot.
Regards Colin Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
-

colin_12
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: Hazelbrook
by norwest on Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:49 pm
#2 & 4 are my picks. I'd like to see a larger version of #4. Well done.
-
norwest
- Member
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:12 pm
- Location: Namoi Valley North West NSW
by biggerry on Mon Jan 23, 2012 7:44 pm
Remorhaz wrote:I really quite like #2 - it may be a cliche but it is very nicely done - I would have perhaps liked a little bit more on the top (but I don't know what was up there)
yeah, me too, the only problem was teh sky and for some I used the GND but i found even with teh cloudy day this set of falls was very hard to nail with a good bit of sky in there, i actually reckon a blue sky with the bigstopper would work well here.. Remorhaz wrote:#3 however really takes my fancy - not exactly sure why but I liked it when I first saw it and strangely at first I didn't feel like I was looking down at all - it wasn't till I studied it more that I tipped in (perhaps thats why I like it - got me looking for a while  )
I tell ya what, its a bit hair raising at that spot, the camera and tripod are out on teh rock wall and its a 200+ metre drop straight down. The conditions were pretty perfect for this set of falls, quite late in teh day and very cloudy, plenty of water flowing and nice wet rocks from teh rain... colin_12 wrote:Number 3 for me as well Gerry. That is a classic shot.
cheers Colin. norwest wrote:#2 & 4 are my picks. I'd like to see a larger version of #4. Well done.
should be able to click thru for a larger version here.. 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by Willy wombat on Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:05 pm
I like them all - water looks a bit purple in #1? Why is that?
-

Willy wombat
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia
by zafra52 on Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:12 pm
I rather like 3#, because of its unusual perspective
-

zafra52
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4857
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 10:22 pm
- Location: Brisbane
by norwest on Tue Jan 24, 2012 9:13 pm
should be able to click thru for a larger version here..
Now that's my pick of the bunch. Love the depth in the shot.
-
norwest
- Member
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:12 pm
- Location: Namoi Valley North West NSW
by biggerry on Tue Jan 24, 2012 9:26 pm
Willy wombat wrote:I like them all - water looks a bit purple in #1? Why is that?
good point, dunno, however easy enough to correct, i just desat the purple, looks better imo.  zafra52 wrote:I rather like 3#, because of its unusual perspective  it is a little bizarre  norwest wrote:Now that's my pick of the bunch. Love the depth in the shot.
interesting, i nearly did not bother editing those shots into a pano, however I am glad I did, the clouds and mist do give it a bit extra i think.
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by surenj on Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:41 am
Hi Gerry, #1 You've corrected the mauve cast well. I think the rock at the bottom right slightly intrudes as it's slightly cut off. #2 is superb compo. #3 superb perspective. I wasn't brave enough to manipulate the tripod to get this shot. Infact I wasn't even sure it was possible. Nicely done indeed! Watch that mauve cast though. Did you see it? If not, you might need to borrow the caibrator or maybe I need a new monitor! #4 I can see either a real or digital grad at work and it detracts. Pull the effect back a little. #5 superb especially since I saw you nailing this in 2 shots! The spider must have also seen you with at least one of it's many eyes... For all of them, I suggest slightly reducing saturation. perhaps 5%. hth.
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by biggerry on Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:57 pm
surenj wrote:Hi Gerry, #1 You've corrected the mauve cast well. I think the rock at the bottom right slightly intrudes as it's slightly cut off. #2 is superb compo. #3 superb perspective. I wasn't brave enough to manipulate the tripod to get this shot. Infact I wasn't even sure it was possible. Nicely done indeed! Watch that mauve cast though. Did you see it? If not, you might need to borrow the caibrator or maybe I need a new monitor! #4 I can see either a real or digital grad at work and it detracts. Pull the effect back a little. #5 superb especially since I saw you nailing this in 2 shots! The spider must have also seen you with at least one of it's many eyes... For all of them, I suggest slightly reducing saturation. perhaps 5%. hth.
cheers for teh feedback Suren, yes you are correct about more mauve (spell?) cast in the other image as well. Gonna have to borrow that calibrator again  Grad lines in the pano, yes if you look hard enough there is, I may well go back and revisit that to clean them up. I also agree with the saturation aspect, in my defence I blame teh polariser  good to have another set of eyes to gauge off. 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|