Page 1 of 1

"angel eyes" Portrait...

PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 4:08 pm
by flipfrog
im wondering if what i did in PP works or not, my goal was to bring out her eyes, im not sure if the gaussian blur was overkill or not

critiques/comments pls


<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/deesignphotography/19276060/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://photos14.flickr.com/19276060_ac6e6a0eca_o.jpg" width="1124" height="843" alt="portrait of an Angela" /></a>

PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 4:16 pm
by PiroStitch
Dee,

IMHO leave the pupils or iris sharp and gaussian blur the rest. right now, it looks like her eyes are about to pop out...literally ;)

PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 4:18 pm
by flipfrog
so meaning not the eyelids or lashes ?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 4:18 pm
by redline
its seems a bit unnatural, why not use a effect like wide dof on your lenses? use selective dof to have one eye sharp?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 4:22 pm
by gstark
Sorry, Dee, but this doesn't do it for me. I'd like to see both eyes crystal clear, and perhaps a tad less light blowing out on the far cheek.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 4:29 pm
by PiroStitch
flipfrog wrote:so meaning not the eyelids or lashes ?


Nope not eyelids or lashes, leave them as blurred.

If you have a wacom, this is when it becomes extremely useful ;)

what I usually do, which by no means is the definitive answer, is duplicate the layer, g/blur it about 3.x pixels or to suit, then change the layer style to overlay or soft light.

using the eraser in airbrush mode, reduce the flow to ~20% or less, and casually erase the blurred areas that you would like sharp. This takes a bit of refinement so best to duplicate the layers before you begin each step, just in case you want to go back ;)

You can do it with a mouse as well, but I find the size of the brush and flow is much easier and more dynamic with a wacom.

Btw, I'd consider sharpening the teeth as well...err not Dracula style ;)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 3:40 am
by KerryPierce
As is, it doesn't work for me, Dee. The blur is too heavy for my tastes. A more subtle blur might do it, either as an overall thing or by selecting an oval around the eyes with a very large feather to gradually blur the image the farther away one looks from the eyes.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:11 am
by sirhc55
With such a close up shot the sharpness of both eyes does not look natural. The brain tends to say ”there’s something wrong” IMO 8)

portrait

PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 3:13 pm
by bobrob
its ok to experiment, but this one does not work
bobrob