This my personal favourite.

And here's one fom the other day which I thought was interesting.

Any comments appreciated.
My gallery:http://geoffc.smugmug.com/
More pics to come.
Geoff C
My 1st pic postsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
My 1st pic postsFinally got around to getting some of my pics hosted.
This my personal favourite. ![]() And here's one fom the other day which I thought was interesting. ![]() Any comments appreciated. My gallery:http://geoffc.smugmug.com/ More pics to come. Geoff C Last edited by antman on Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:36 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Great first image post Antman!
That second one has got me quite perplexed...almost like reverse rain! In the first one, I'd maybe give it a tweak on contrast or sharpening - it's a great shot but just seems a tad soft to me. Don't forget to include your location in your profile so we know where to send the fan mail... ![]() Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Thanks Jonesy,
I'm pretty sure it was Cambridge. One of the colleges there. 2nd pic was off Narrabeen Headland.
Hi Geoff
welcome to our community Your picture of Cambridge is lovely, it's rare to see a gorgeous sunny day in olde sunny England. Keep on posting
Geoff, i like the 1st shots it's a nice picture and that 2ns one is a beauty, the water splashes looks very good, keep it up.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
Nice work Geoff.
I agree that the first one would benefit from straightening, although I don't know whether I would sharpen it - the relative softness is part of the appeal for me. The second is a very interesting capture. Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Terrific start Geoff
![]() ![]() ![]() "The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
Welcome Geoff, Second shot is a ripper great timing
Ben Yu
D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!! Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
Thanks for the replys.
Still not sure about the horizon needing staightening. I think it may just be a bit of an optical illusion. The tops of the buildings look pretty horizontal to me. I appreciate the constructive comments.
Nice images antman - thanx for posting them.
![]() If you hold a ruler square to the bottom edge of your monitor, you'll see that your vertical lines in #1 ARE vertical. Therefore the picture does not need to be straightened. There is an illusion of the image being tilted because: - the pic was not taken square to the building, but on an angle - the bottom of the building appears to rise as it recedes into the frame. You often see this effect with shore lines as well. You can prove this by rotating the image in PS until the bottom of the building appears to be straight to your eye, then checking the vertical lines in the building. Lovely building BTW. ![]() TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Previous topic • Next topic
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|