Patterns

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Patterns

Postby Alpha_7 on Sat Nov 12, 2005 3:32 pm

Saw these today, and found them interesting, I've fiddle with this a little to try to bring the patterns out, but fairly undecided on if they work or not.

Image

Image

Image


Image

Click for bigger images :)
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Katie G on Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:21 pm

Didn't anyone like these ? Craig and I found a cool fountain in homebush, it had some nice patterns on it, the patterns look better in black and white.
User avatar
Katie G
Newbie
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney

Postby coolbeer6 on Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:28 pm

I like the first one - as the pattern isn't perfect and it has a interesting texure - that is it??????
User avatar
coolbeer6
Member
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Perth WA

Postby Katie G on Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:33 pm

Craig isn't around so I'll answer for him, the first one is the same pattern, but with a small layer of water flowing over it, as part of the fountain or water feature. The water foams and bubbles a little when it hits the edges, giving the texture you mentioned.
User avatar
Katie G
Newbie
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney

Postby coolbeer6 on Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:43 pm

Thanks Katie.. tell Craig i would like to know what the unedited pic looks like....
User avatar
coolbeer6
Member
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Perth WA

Postby wendellt on Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:48 pm

Hi craig

good to see your consciously framing with lines aligning up in the cormers, in composing i always try to make at least 1 or 2 lines meet up in a any of the 4 corners of the frame. In most images i can see you have utilized one of golden guidlines i always adhere to in my work.

Glad to see also that you are taking the time out to isolate certain elements that would notmally not catch anyones immediate interest, your images force us to look closer and see more than what is obviously presented. Having a strong design background i can see why you chose to photograph these repetitive cascading patterns, they present design and form and the manner in which they were captured in pure minimalism is commendable.

On your next venture out I would suggest is to work more on dramatic perspective to form a point of interest, at the moment they are just patterns to most people, if you take the image at a certain angle that has a definite vanishing point the image will be more interesting it will lead the eye. Currently the images just make the eye look at them flat, there is not much visual movement. Next time think about how different camera angles can give a dramatic improvement to your work, number 3 is a good example.

if anyone is wondering what i mean by framing it's a term i use to describe composing not those photohsop actins used to make frames.
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:37 am

Thanks for the comments, I'll post the original water shot when I get home.

Listening to what you said Wendell I do think I could of shot these better and at a more interesting angle. I was a little wary with the dry ones, as I didn't want the fountain to fire up and start wetting me, and more importantly the camera, but fortunately it stayed dormant.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby stubbsy on Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:53 pm

Craig

Of these #1 is the only one with any strong interest for me. It has more texture to it largely because of the water. The others are a little flat.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:12 pm

Thanks for being honest Peter. I guess the challenge I set myself was try to make something fairly mundane a little more interesting. I think I failed to do so, apart from in the first shot, and really it's almost cheating as the flowing water did most the work for me. I think some of Krystian's recent work inspired me to try this approach but I have a long way to go yet.

:D
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Alpha_7 on Wed Nov 16, 2005 10:26 pm

As promised here is the original straight from the camera version of #1, better late then never.

Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby mic on Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:19 pm

A

I like the 2nd as a Landscape and bigger as well.

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby marcotrov on Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:20 pm

#1 and #4 for me Craig. IMO the shadows formed by the tile edges form an interesting and rather strong visual pattern. Perhaps exploring a few cropping options in #4 could have produced even more visual appeal. Nice shots.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques