Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Alpha_7 on Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:21 pm
I know I don't take the greatest shots, but seems to work pretty well
I just wanted to point out that Rel you are far to modest, your macro work is great...on topic if these are still the latests and greatest in 11months then I'll be adding one to my kit 
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by big pix on Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:37 pm
Depth of field on macros is quite shallow......... so when shooting at night you need as much power as possible that YOU KNOW HOW TO CONTROL.............to get the best results......... practice practice practice
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by blacknstormy on Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:43 pm
Bernie - I think I'll be picking your brains at our next meet my friend
Alpha - you are way too kind. But why wait 11 months? Is really not much money for a fantastic tool
Rel
-

blacknstormy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
- Location: Ipswich Qld
-
by Alpha_7 on Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:06 am
blacknstormy wrote:Bernie - I think I'll be picking your brains at our next meet my friend  Alpha - you are way too kind. But why wait 11 months? Is really not much money for a fantastic tool Rel
Rel - See my signature, I have some time to wait till the ban is lifted  Even small purchases 
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by big pix on Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:08 am
blacknstormy wrote:Bernie - I think I'll be picking your brains at our next meet my friend  Rel
......please be gentle........
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by nito on Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:09 pm
Got LS PJ with dome diffuser today. Will post some shots hopefully tonight with it. 
-
nito
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
- Location: Gladesville, NSW
by nito on Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:34 pm
The shots are either of my lounge with the famous chicken and bear. A lasolite grey card was used to normalise the WB.
The instructions recommend 45 degree slant on the shot.
90 degree is reserved for high ceillings, but tested with my low ceilling home.
Direct flash was taken to make a comparision with the LS PJ with the new dome attachment.
The dome attachment.
These shots looked at skin tone with the LS PJ with dome as a fill flash under indoor normal lighting.
Direct flash on skin tone,
Compared to the LS PJ with dome.
Conclusion
Gives very nice spread of light. Both the subject and background is elegantly lit. I think the shot with the 90 degree flash angle gives the best result.
The new dome give less washed out in colours than a direct fire of the flash gun. There is a slight improvement with skin tone when used as a flash fill during daylight conditions.
-
nito
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
- Location: Gladesville, NSW
by sirhc55 on Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:06 pm
I got my dutch cap today nito but have been too busy to try it yet. From the look of your shots I am going to enjoy having a play. 
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by stubbsy on Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:09 pm
Thanks Nghia
So you think the PJ with the dome is better than without?
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by nito on Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:11 pm
sirhc55, I am quite happy with the LS purchase. Best $60 spent, dunno about the dome cap for $20. I prefer the LS, pointed straight up than use the dome cap aimed directly at the subject. Maybe better results can be obtained with human subjects at low light. More experiments required. 
-
nito
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
- Location: Gladesville, NSW
by Manta on Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:55 pm
BlacknStormy should have received her dome cap today, or will very soon. We both use our PJs out in the field at night for frog and insect macro shots (45deg angle usually) so it will be interesting to see how the dome adds to the effect. I'm holding off on ordering mine until I've seen hers in operation for the sort of stuff we photograph. I'm sure it will be a worthwhile piece of kit and only a matter of time before I order one.
Thanks for the comparison shots Nito. They've turned out very well.
Gotta love the lightsphere!!!!
-

Manta
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
-
- Posts: 3815
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
- Location: Hamilton Qld
-
by bloop on Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:04 pm
Greetings people with the domes, may I ask if it's worth buying one? The LSPJ seems to do a pretty good job without it, although I haven't tried it outdoors.
-

bloop
- Member
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 12:06 am
- Location: Chipping Norton, NSW
by Zeeke on Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:08 pm
Interesting Photos.... and interesting info... ive been thinking about getting one for all my macro shots... just need to play with one and see how it goes
Tim
-

Zeeke
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: Sunshine Coast, Qld, AU
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|