


Comments and critique are welcome.
3 dandies from BrittaniaModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
3 dandies from BrittaniaI caught some dandy images today. Here's a small sample of what I've got, with more still to come. I love this little spot. The first one has a weird light in the sky because of the mixture of industrial light from the right and moonlight on the left. The 2nd is from a more dramatic angle, unfortunately I cut off the top, might have to clone it in or something, the third I forgot to take out of ISO 1600, so converted to bw, which worked out not too badly.
![]() ![]() ![]() Comments and critique are welcome.
Amazing colour and composition - first one is my favourite, I love the clouds in it
Whats the length of exposure time on these? Edit: Just looked at EXIF data - 536 seconds? Last edited by pharmer on Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dave - all three are great photos, especially one and two. In #2, with some selective burning and dodging, you could lift it to another level IMO.
![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Lovely stuff Dooda, your night photography is something else, I'd love to have a chance to do a night shoot with you and see you at work.. I guess my chances are a little slim.
#1 is my favourite, I love the lights and cloud almost looks like aurora borealis #2 the Angle is great, and the star trails are a great addition #3 Love the detail in the foreground stumps and then the smooth lake and gorgeous mountain range
the first is a standout for me.
the lighting says aurora. great lighting. Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Chris,
I'd love to hear what burning and dodging you'd do... the wall on the left facing, make it darker? THat might be an idea as I think that the headlights were reflecting off of that particular area making it a little lighter than the rest, but none of the detail is blown out. Thanks for the comments everyone. I was quite happy with all three.
Beautiful Dooda - the first one makes me feel as though I'm being sucked into a vortex !!!!!!
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
bloody amazing!!
Awesome images... the 1st would have to be my favourite!! Tim D70 - D200/MBD200 Coming soon - Too Much Gear, Not Enough Talent
My Site: http://www.digitalstill.net My Fishing Site: http://www.fishseq.com
Thanks for the comments all.
What bothers me the most about the second one (aside from the clipped top) is the length of the star trails. Eventhough this was an 8 minute exposure, they're too bright and short. I think I might have to go back with a fresh battery and a 20-30 minute exposure, which would dim them and make the streaks longer. Perhaps at F8 or so... I've also thought about throwing in some kind of disposable light source so that light shines through the holes in the roof and doorways. Any ideas? It would have to be cheap because it's a throwaway (can't retrieve it) and non-flammable for obvious reasons.
Dave,
What beautiful images these are. They remind me of Cedar Key in Florida, or perhaps the backwater areas in Louisiana. Well done. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
perhaps the things called cyalume light sticks. not sure what you guys call em, but basically little plastic tubes around 4 inchs or so long, full of liquid. has a little glass vial inside which you snap resulting in up to 24hrs of chemical light. not hot. and available in different colours Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Some times called Glow Stix (Sticks), smaller versions are often used in fishing!
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|