

Old Shed in B&WModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Old Shed in B&WAnother pic I took yesterday of an archtypical old farm shed with associated junk around it. Converted to BW with a Kodak Tri-X plugin I had laying around. A little grain added plus a small adjustment of the shadows and contrast. I can't decide if it's art or crap..
![]() ![]() If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
Good start
Could probably do with a little more around it, looks a bit tight. And the highlights need to come out a bit, just do add some lift.
Great subject. I especially like the contrast of the concrete wire leaning against the corrugated shed.
If anything though i reckon it could do with a bit more contrast. Get those greys blacker and those whites whiter and you will have a winner. ![]() Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
think it is cropped a tad tight for the subject and treatment.
would have worked better for me had I been able to see that the shed was in the country somewhere. Steve check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
Thanks Mike, Steve and Steve. OK, went back to the original uncropped pic (not much different) added some more grain for more olde worlde effect (can't see it myself
![]() ![]() If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
John,
Five stars hotel? ![]() You've been busy yesterday and lately!!!! Now, you were converted to B&W? Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Doubly Funny Birdy!! Firstly, the reason it is a tight crop was to avoid another building in the background that Dad built to live in whilst he built the main house and we always jokingly call it the "Five Star Shed". ![]() Secondly because if I had a D200 I could have taken it in B&W in the first place ![]() If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
John,
In my opinion, the second image has much more 'punch.' Higher contrast adds depth to what could be considered a flat image, that is one that has lots of neutral grey areas. Although that is not a criticism of your first image, which is fine in it's own right. But adding more contrast just gives a B&W image a bit more range of grey gradients in the ex-treme ends of the scale. It's the difference between true B&W and greyscale. Matt. K posted a great article on how to get the best B&W from a colour image. http://www.dslrusers.com/viewtopic.php? ... t=absolute Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
John
I was about to post and say what Steve had said about more punch needed, then I saw the second version. You've nailed it. The composition was always good, now the exposure sings too. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|