
Cheers,
Paul.
http://www.sydneywebcam.com.au/
[/url]
Panorama of QE2 in Circular QuayModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Panorama of QE2 in Circular QuayHaving seen Potatis' terrific shot of the Spit Bridge (POTW Jan 10th) I have been inspired to get out and shoot panoramas as much as possible. I took this shot last night (Thursday 16th Feb) of the QE2 berthed at the Overseas Passenger Terminal in Circular Quay. It's made up of 12 images stitched together and shot with a 50mm lens. I have used the software Potatis recommended (The Panorama Factory) and found it much better than Photoshop's Photomerge. Please click image below for full version (400kb)
![]() Cheers, Paul. http://www.sydneywebcam.com.au/ [/url] Last edited by sydneywebcam on Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nice job Paul!
A lot of work can go into one of those. My only comment on the technical quality is that you need to take care you don't over-sharpen your image. It is one of the most common errors in post processing. Also, as mentioned, the whites on the boat are a little hot. Thanks for the stunning view. Regards
Matt. K
Thanks for the helpful comments. The problem with the highlights on the deck of the ship is that they were using spotlights to light it and trying to balance those in the overall exposure is tricky, especially on a long exposure. I did burn them in on a separate layer in multilply mode, but there is a limit to what you can do before it starts going off.
Matt as for the sharpening I always seem to run into problems when resizing for the web. My files are normally huge and when they get reduced to web size they are very soft indeed. Any sort of sharpening (I use smart sharpen in CS2) seems to degrade the image. Any tips in this area would be appreciated. Cheers, Paul.
Paul
I often have the same problem...though I don't specifically save for the web. Many of my images lose their subtlety when posted and for that reason there are images that I simply won't post. I believe you can't beat a fine print for beauty. Regards
Matt. K
I am with you there Matt. There is a world of difference between a quality print and a web image. Still the only way many people will see any image is on a web page. I printed a full size section of that panorama on my Epson R1800 and the detail in it is terrific. I find that images with large amounts of detail suffer most from the resizing & subsequent sharpening. _____________________ Cheers, Paul.
Pretty good Pano. At first i thought the fence detracted from the image, but as i looked at the image as a whole, it decided it helps to add some foreground interest. Great work.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
I saw this first on Paul's "webcam" site and thought it was great... It really captures the scale of the QE2... I saw the funnel sticking up above the deck of the Harbour Bridge yesterday morning when driving to work and only then realised how large the thing is...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Paul,
One of things abou sharpening is that you shouldn't do it. Too often, to the one image. Hold off until you've finished all pp and resized it for presentation, and only then should you do the sharpening. What method did you use? I always take it to where it's just oversharpened, and then pull back from that point. In your image, looking at the fence in the foreground, look at the circles that block out the water aat the intersections of the fence's diagonals. Now look at the edges of these circles, at the water, and you can see quite clearly that there's a "halo" sort of effect around each of the circles, where a small section of the water appears a little lighter in its shading compared with the rest of the water as seen through the fence. Now look at the horizontal and vertical parts of the fence, and you can see a similar effect there, but to a lesser degree. If you saved a version of the image before sharpening, I'd go to that image and reattempt the sharpening, looking for these artefacts, and then reduce the sharpening to the point where they disappear, and then maybe a tad more, and see how that looks. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Paul
A very good pano of a damn big boat. And to amplify on Gary's point about sharpening Paul - do the sharpening once only and AFTER you've resized it for the web (having saved a full size copy separately for printing whcih you'll sharpen separately) Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Thanks for the sharpening tips Gary. I normally optimise my images for printing and they are sharpened for that. Then I resize that one and that's where the problems creep in. I will do what has been suggested in future.
Those halos you see are not actually from the sharpening, but from a PS plugin called Velvia Vision from Fred Miranda. There is an option to increase dynamic range and this is a by product of that. Normally it's not noticable at full resolution, but of course when it's resized for the web it shows up. There is always plenty to learn no matter how experienced you think you are! That's what I love about this forum, lots of helpful people to offer advice. _______________________ Cheeers, Paul.
I can only echo what other people have said, Compo and idea is excellent! Over PPed though...
Huge bloody boat.... New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Cracking image here Paul, that's one big tinny for sure.
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Excellent Image and great composition, and I echo what you say about all the help and suggestions of this great forum!!! Gary's comments on sharpening have been helpful tonight in my own PP efforts!!!
![]() cheers Tony D70 18-70mm Kit Lens, Nikkor70-300mm ED, Nikkor 50mm f1.8, Tamron 70-300MM F/4-5.6 LD MACRO 1:2, Sigma 28-200 1:4~5.6, TC-16A AF Teleconverter, SB-800 Nikon F60 Film Body.
![]()
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|