I thought I'd post some landscape images for C&C as I usually shy away from them due lack of pleasing results.



Cheers
A few attempts at landscapeModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A few attempts at landscapeHello all,
I thought I'd post some landscape images for C&C as I usually shy away from them due lack of pleasing results. ![]() ![]() ![]() Cheers Matt
Very good shots
Nice composition on all Taken in high midday sun? Heavy polarizer effect - Maybe even nicer if taken at dawn or dusk Only compositon change I can suggest is remove the beach in photo 3 - looks a bit dirty/messy - pristine white sand always looks better ![]()
Nice stuff Matt, I'd be pleased if they were mine.
Composition is good, but I'm not so keen on the colour of the water, for me the sky is almost over powering it, I'd prefer a more balanced approach (if that even makes a modicom of sense).
Matt
Seeing these I can see why you shy away from them. NOT Image #1 is a cracker. Brilliantly strong leading lines and that gorgeous aquamarine water that looks like it's straight out of a TV commercial. If I was to nit pick (and they're tiny nits) I have a problem with that big white cloud in top left which unbalances the image with its dominance. And I'd like nature to take away those ugly brown/green blemishes in the water #2 - well to be honest I'm still blown away by #1, but getting back to #2 this doesn't work for me. The sky is great, but the foreground interest isn't there. I flick between the large boat on the RHS and the tiny one on the LHS. Compositionally I'd have ignored rule of turds on this and chosen neat and in the middle. #3 - almost as strong compositionally as #1, but I'd like some foreground interest (a couple strolling along, a child making sandcastles, some beach umbrellas) to anchor the middle of the shot. That said, I think this is a very striking image and I'm being hypercritical All in all I'd say your great photographic skills are well in evidence here and these are no argument for shying away from landscapes. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Bloody hell (to take a line out of our new tourism advertising campaign
![]() more please ![]() Rel Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
probably the last one is most interesting becasue the dramatic clouds compliment the aangle of the walkway
each picture has a secondary subject element liek in pic 2 the boat, usually when i compose there is a main subject and just to make the image more dimensional a secondary subject, but i only take shots of spannign simple scenes with these two elements, that's a trick to create interest and visual interplay, beign a designer yourself i am sure you are familiar with it in your images there is too much goign on in the background for your main and secondary subjects to work effectively they look 1:1 to create a dramatic landscape doesn't necassarily mean getting everything in, sometimes you have to frame thoughtfully to get less in for example i have a 12mm lens sometimes when i take a wide shot i get heaps of elements in that doesn't make for a great landscape i usually shoot at 24mm framign only the most interestign bits of a landscape anyway my thoughts only
Hi Matt. I love the last one, that shot is great. I think the sand provides enough of an interest in the foreground otherwise anything more would compete with the awesome structure in the clouds. Lovely colours both in the sky and the water. Mind if I ask where these were taken?
Cheers, Owen.
They're all taken from a sort of standing viewpoint. Try crouching sometimes and pointing upwards, or get in closer to some of the foreground elements. THe blue is way too strong for me in all of these.
Matt
No.1 for me, too. This shot really draws you into the scene. Great colours and nice use of wide-angled lens. If this isn't your usual 'thing', it should be! Nice work Cheers Michael
G'day,
Don't shy away anymore, these are really good... All have stunning color, assuming a polariser was used? #1, Great lines, tempted to get lower so the left railing is more of the subject and higher in the frame, horizon same level but the rails higher (if you know what I mean doh ![]() #2, terrific sky! Needs something more in the foreground/middleground though, but not sure what... sorry ![]() #3, This is another good'n. something about the sand is distracting my eye though, try cropping the sand out from the bottom and just past the second pair of pylons of the pier on the right, see what you reckon... Aka Andrew
Owen, these were taken at Sorrento near Melbourne. Thank you for the constructive critique guys, really appreciate it. I'll add a final one into this thread from the same shoot. This is another side of the same pier, but I went for a lower perspective and as I was shooting more into the sun the polariser effect wasn't as strong. ![]() Cheers Matt
Number one is my favourite from the trio. Just love that long jetty stretching out to the horizon with the clouds mirroring it.
With number two the sky is starting to look a little unnatural for me with the high saturation. I feel number three would be perfect with a crop to the water line so that the jetty starts in the right hand corner. Great work. ________________ Cheers, Paul. Last edited by sydneywebcam on Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|