Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by avkomp on Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:53 pm
I went out to photograph these guys today and other than this shot didnt have much luck.
I quite like the exposure on the bird but unsure of whether the whole shot works because the background is quite busy. opinions??
I would have liked more room at the tail but this is full frame except for a little cropped off the right.
he wouldnt land where I had the tripod set up and this is a little closer than I was planning on.
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by NJ on Sun Mar 19, 2006 10:07 pm
looks great to me!
its so sharp and the exposure is spot on! 
-

NJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: Ringwood, Melbourne
by Big V on Sun Mar 19, 2006 10:14 pm
Steve, this is a nice shot and dont worry about the background, because that is where the bird was. I do not find the branches distracting due to the yellow in the bird drawing your eye up to its eye...
Canon
-

Big V
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2301
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:37 am
- Location: Adelaide
by Oneputt on Sun Mar 19, 2006 10:18 pm
To hell with the background, I like this.  The expression in the eye of the bird is priceless.
-

Oneputt
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.
-
by avkomp on Sun Mar 19, 2006 10:54 pm
The expression in the eye of the bird is priceless.
not sure what you mean here?
Steve
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by BBJ on Sun Mar 19, 2006 11:17 pm
WOW Steve damn thats a nice picture of a birdy. Background is ok as well the bird make it stands out so i would leave it and yeh great bloody shot.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X 80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
-

BBJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3651
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
- Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X
-
by ABG on Sun Mar 19, 2006 11:41 pm
That is one sharp as a tack image Steve. Why not work on the background in PP? Just don't ask me how. Or has theenergypolice scared you off this path? 
Andrew
-

ABG
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 1:53 pm
- Location: Oatley, Sydney
-
by Oneputt on Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:58 am
Steve I meant that the bird looks shocked. The eye is so sharp.
-

Oneputt
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.
-
by avkomp on Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:35 am
oneputt:
you often see them jump when the flash goes off. sometimes you only get one shot off before they fly away.
I guess the sb-800 has high WTF? value to animals.
Steve
Last edited by avkomp on Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by Oneputt on Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:43 am
I think that the WTF is probably right 
-

Oneputt
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.
-
by gstark on Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:59 am
Steve,
I'd leave the background as it is; it's just fine, and furthermore, the feel it has, with the basically parrallel lines, I think helps this image.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by NikonUser on Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:25 am
Great shot!!
I know how jumpy these guys can be! This one is nice and sharp and the DOF is great.
I personally find the background a little distracting... If you had that pose without all the clutter it would be almost perfect (except for the space around the tail as you mentioned)
Paul
-

NikonUser
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
- Location: Canberra - **D2X**
-
by kipper on Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:54 am
Steve, I don't think the background complements the bird that well. I'd be looking to get the shot with more greens/yellows/browns and of course OOF with just the perch that the bird is sitting on tack sharp. But that is just me.
Darryl (aka Kipper) Nikon D200
-
kipper
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3738
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Hampshire, UK
by NikonUser on Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:56 am
May I ask for some camera settings? EXIF seems to be stripped?
Paul
-

NikonUser
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1064
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:18 pm
- Location: Canberra - **D2X**
-
by avkomp on Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:14 am
Steve, I don't think the background complements the bird that well. I'd be looking to get the shot with more greens/yellows/browns and of course OOF with just the perch that the bird is sitting on tack sharp. But that is just me.
I felt the same also. I tried, but they wouldnt go where I wanted/needed them to go.
I plan to return and see if I can find a spot where they might cooperate.
the exif has been stripped because I use an action for the border which pastes the original into a new image. hence no exif
80-400mm @ 400mm
1/60 sec, f/16
Mode: Av
Metering: Center-weighted average
ISO: 200
AF mode: AF-S
White balance: SUNNY
Flash: NORMAL ttl @-2EV
Saturation: Normal
Sharpness: NONE
Contrast: Normal
I made this shot worse by using f16. normally try to keep around f8 so the backgrounds are well OOF. Still not sure how it moved and why I didnt notice. luckily VR saved this shot for me (note that it was handheld @ 1/60th and 400mm.) corrected fstop after this shot though
I had the tripod setup where I hoped and this guy landed to the left of where I needed, a swing to the left wouldnt give me a shot so I took the cam off the tripod and moved left for the shot.
Steve
Last edited by avkomp on Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by kipper on Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:43 am
Yeah, it'd be really nice to get this bird on a background that had some peach/orange colors in it?
Also I think the shot is a bit too tight, it needs room to the left/bottom aswell as even more room for the bird to look into. The angle is also a bit steep.
Darryl (aka Kipper) Nikon D200
-
kipper
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3738
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: Hampshire, UK
by greencardigan on Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:21 am
avkomp wrote:handheld @ 1/60th and 400mm
Crikey!
Excuse me while I drool on the keyboard.
Now I just have to wait for that tax check.
-

greencardigan
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
- Location: Wollongong
-
by avkomp on Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:26 am
angle is also a bit steep.
not sure why it looks like that,
I believe it was just above eye level ( a foot or so.)
Is tight in the frame for the reasons already mentioned. much closer than planned, no time to rezoom. was going to crop as portrait only but didnt look right with the background.
want a cleaner background but this is my very first shutter press on one of these.
-

avkomp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2485
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
- Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5
-
by Finch on Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:19 pm
Nice shot, Steve.
A bit tight and I agree that it would have been nice to have all of tail in shot, but overall a nice shot. Nice colours, very sharp and the sticks in background are not distrurbing to me at all, especially since they all face the same direction.
Well captured shot of a bird that is difficult to photograph.
Cheers
Michael
-

Finch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:49 pm
- Location: Keperra, Brisbane
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|