waterfront shot

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

waterfront shot

Postby IM4U2NV81 on Mon Apr 03, 2006 6:49 am

Image

image was taken in Pensacola, Florida. I used the "cloudy" WB setting because I enjoy the rich golden tones.
IM4U2NV81
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:46 am
Location: Pensacola, FL

Postby IM4U2NV81 on Mon Apr 03, 2006 11:19 am

c&c welcome
IM4U2NV81
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:46 am
Location: Pensacola, FL

Postby owen on Mon Apr 03, 2006 11:27 am

Hi Mate. I gotta be honest and say that nothing really appeals to me about the image. The building and half-a-boat don't really provide much interest and although there are rocks in the foreground they are out of focus.

Possibly a reshoot by getting the whole boat in would work, and choosing an aperture of about f/11 - f/16 and focusing 1/3 of the way into the frame would help to get everything sharp.

Hope this helps mate.
Owen.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby Oneputt on Mon Apr 03, 2006 11:45 am

I think that this shot would have been better with less of the bank and more of the boat. There is insufficient interest on the bank and the soft focus doesn't really help.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby avkomp on Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:25 pm

doesnt do a lot for me either.

seems very busy in foreground and background but nothing really the focal point or subject of the shot.

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby IM4U2NV81 on Mon Apr 03, 2006 5:16 pm

I get what you're saying and can agree with what you're saying.

The reason I decided to focus on the rocks was I was intrigued by the texture and thought it had a lot of contrast within itself.

BUT...as you said, the boat is kind of just "entering" the frame, no real striking interest there.

I guess its one of those things when you think you have something but others just dont agree. hahahaha, not saying you're wrong and I'm right, not at all.

Thanks for the comments fellas. I probably will start throwing more images up for comments and critique
IM4U2NV81
Newbie
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:46 am
Location: Pensacola, FL

Postby owen on Mon Apr 03, 2006 5:25 pm

Yeah keep at it mate. If possible when you're out taking shots, get a couple of angles. I think a landscape one of the above photos would get the rocks as well as the boat in, which would help it out a lot.

Look forward to seeing some more from you.

Cheers,
Owen.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby Killakoala on Mon Apr 03, 2006 6:45 pm

Make it really high contrast B&W and i reckon you've got a winner. Make those blacks really black and the whites really white though.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques