Composition - Which do you prefer ?

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Composition - Which do you prefer ?

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:01 pm

Here are four differently framed shots of basically the same subject matter one of the resort pools at sunrise. Sadly the last one suffered due to tripod slippage it was splade out to get nice and low and one of the legs was too loose, I probably would of been better of with a beanbag then using the tripod, my Sony. Click on the thumnail for a bigger version.

Image Image Image
Image

Links Fixed, thanks Rooboy!
Last edited by Alpha_7 on Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby rooboy on Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:22 pm

You need to change your links, at the moment they simply link to the thumb (_s) instead of the larger size (_m). Also, the second _m shot is ~900kb, it hasn't been resized, so I can't really compare it yet :)

Technical difficulties aside, the blurred one isn't recoverable IMO. #1 has a nice sense of symmetry, but I think #3 is the better composed, the curve of the trees leads your eye to the boat nicely. I would have like a tad more trees, but they're all great shots :D
So join in the chorus, and sing it one and all!
User avatar
rooboy
Member
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 9:14 am
Location: Maroubra, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:24 pm

rooboy wrote:You need to change your links, at the moment they simply link to the thumb (_s) instead of the larger size (_m). Also, the second _m shot is ~900kb, it hasn't been resized, so I can't really compare it yet :)

Technical difficulties aside, the blurred one isn't recoverable IMO. #1 has a nice sense of symmetry, but I think #3 is the better composed, the curve of the trees leads your eye to the boat nicely. I would have like a tad more trees, but they're all great shots :D



Thanks Rooboy, I'll make the necessary corrections. Oops. :oops:
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby moggy on Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:31 pm

Nice shots Craig, I like them all and think #4 would have been a stunner. :wink:

8) Bob.

.
User avatar
moggy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s

Postby DStrom on Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:34 pm

I think had #4 not been blured would have been the best,

because it has less empty space at the top of the image.
User avatar
DStrom
Member
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 1:38 pm
Location: Erskineville, Sydney - Nikon D300 / D70

Postby macka on Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:38 pm

It is a shame about #4, but as it is I'd probably say #1. Lovely colour.
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby avkomp on Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:48 pm

all things being equal, I would have preferred #4
Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:58 pm

Thanks for the feedback, it's a shame I didn't reshoot the shot once I'd fixed the tripod for #4 as I tend to agree it's nicely framed.

Here is another the same day just a little later in the day.
Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby terminator on Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:24 am

#4 is the best for me.
Termy,
http://www.glennlegge.com
"There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs."
Ansel Adams (1902 - 1984)
User avatar
terminator
Member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Woody Point QLD

Postby wendellt on Mon Jun 12, 2006 2:37 pm

craig
seeing thumbnails of these makes it easier if it works small it works big

the 3rd one, but with slightly tighter cropping as i think the space on the left unbalances slightly

othwerwise i like #4 as well even though it's blurry
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby rokkstar on Mon Jun 12, 2006 2:48 pm

Craig,

I like number 3. 4 would have been the best, but out of the rest 3 is the go for me.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby Matt. K on Mon Jun 12, 2006 4:51 pm

Craig
No 4 has the most pleasing composition. Why? I'll leave that for someone else to articulate....but you should be able to articulate why, using the terminology of composition. Ask yourself "Where does the eye travel to and what leads it there"?
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Simon on Mon Jun 12, 2006 6:28 pm

Composition-wise, the 1st and last one do it for me.

The colours look great.
cheers,

- Simon

(Sydney, Australia)
Simon
Newbie
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 2:43 pm
Location: Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques