Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by MCWB on Fri Jun 30, 2006 10:40 pm
Here is a shot from Tuesday that I shot in both colour and IR. I selected the lighness channel from the IR image and pasted it as a new layer of various different types, giving some cool effects! I posted them as thumbnails so as to not totally kill people on 56 k.
Which do you think works best?
Colour image:
[url=http://www.trentwallis.com/gallery/view_photo.php?full=1&set_albumName=DSLRusersmeet060627&id=DSC_2639resized]
Click to enlarge![/url]
- Code: Select all
Colour layer Lighten layer
 - Code: Select all
Normal layer Luminosity layer
Thanks for your critique!
-

MCWB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2121
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
- Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70
by macka on Sat Jul 01, 2006 3:55 pm
These are a bit weird for me, Trent. I prefer the B&W style of IR.
Cheers,
macka a.k.a. Kris
-

macka
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1092
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
- Location: North Rocks, Sydney
-
by stubbsy on Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:06 pm
Trent
I've pondered over these all day before posting since they didn't appeal in any version, but I couldn't quite work out why.
I have now decided the problem is that the original image just lacks punch so overlaying the IR drains even more from the image making it drab and lifeless. I think the concept is great and I'd like to see it tried again, but with a more dynamic image as the base image.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by wendellt on Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:19 pm
very scientific approach to post processing
was your intention to lighten the image using highlight data from the IR image
or were you just experimenting?
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by MCWB on Sat Jul 01, 2006 6:14 pm
Wendell, my intention was to use the lightness data from the IR image and the colour information from the colour image to end up with some sort of interesting effect. I converted the respective images into Lab colour, but couldn't find a way to combine the IR L channel with the colour a and b channels, hence the layered approach. I think the 'normal' layer got closest to this, whereby objects that reflect lots of IR radiation come out close to white, and those that don't reflect IR at all come out as their natural colours.
Peter, I agree that the original image isn't that strong, but I was more interested in the PP technique rather than the end outcome here.
Thanks for the critique guys, will try again!
-

MCWB
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2121
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
- Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|