Adam


CloudsModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
CloudsHere is my fav topic! Couldnt get out so these are from the back of my place. Sky was so amazingly sick looking. Looks like marbled meat! A bit of PP and there u go. C & C as always. Enjoy!
Adam ![]() ![]() D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
Adam
As nice as the clouds are I feel you are falling too much into the habit of seriously overdoing the saturation on your shots to the extent that they no longer look natural. The first one is the worst offender of these two. I've never seen a sky that cyan colour before. These are good images and they don't need to be this overstaurated to have appeal. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
yeah very surreal
although the suburban froth inthe foreground bothers this image eithercompositionally focus on the clouds by shooting higher woudl of been a good shot too if you got a silhouette of somone with the clouds behind by shooting low
I agree with Stubbsy.
These shots have been oversaturated to buggery. There's something to remember for over-saturating shots and it's much like everything else: know when to stop. I also think that while the 1st shot isn't bad (the second one's composition doesn't do much for me), you need to pull some detail from the shadows a bit. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Wow, the saturation is probably a bit strong for me but terrific surreal effect...
Was the sat in RGB or LAB??? Might be able to get a similar level of color sat via curves in LAB but less "in your face" sort of thing maybe? Aka Andrew
Hey! Thanks for the comments! I agree that the colours arent natural and maybe/maybe not thats a bad thing? I made a Black and white ver and that looked pretty neat too. Ill have to redo it and post it up.
The orig was shot at f11 1/640 sec ISO 200 was an overcast morning. I was about to save up a wierd mixed up sky ver played in PS but its in some wierd loop and I have to head out. Ill be back Cheers Adam D50 - AF-S NIKKOR 18-70mm 3.5-4.5G ED
what they all said about over saturation......... but I think they would make great B&Ws
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Sorry Adam, but your PP just hasn't worked IMO. Not only are they oversaturated, but also oversharpened. In the second colour image and the B&W you can see halos around the roof of the house. Your previous posts suggest you can do better.
Cheers,
macka a.k.a. Kris
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|