
SunkissedModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
SunkissedA weekend down South - amazing colours in the water - sharpened and some minor 'healing', a crop (to enlarge the can) - any C&C?
![]() D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Reminds me a bit of this one . http://www.soocool.com/gallery/photos/original/263_Flotsam.jpg
Tony
Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
The contrasting colors work well and the subtle reflection...
Would definately crop to move the can away from the centre though... Hmmm, if cropping I think I'd crop out the TR corner to remove the odd bits of blue that might be reflections from something... Aka Andrew
I'd tend to agree with cropping or 'healing' out the blue.
But I've shifted the can around and can't see it makes the picture any better, IMHO. But - have a play and if you can show me what you mean then that would be valuable for me. D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
G'day mate,
All I've done is simply crop which makes the can seem larger in the frame and maybe a more "imposing" subject??? In the crop, I also made sure I cropped out a bright red part of the wavy reflection so there wasn't a bright color in the BL corner of the frame... Wanted to have dark color in the corners... Just another way of presenting the same image, dunno if it's of any help or not, it's all just good fun ![]() ![]() Aka Andrew
I actually like the fact that it isn't imposing in the original. The unusual red water then becomes an equal focus with the can. Break that rule of thirds and go with the original I say!
Yay, that is what I like about photography - somebody is bound to like your shots, even if it is only your better half (not implying anything here mitchell
![]() Anybody see the politico-environmental statement in the image, a used tin consumed and discarded and floating on a sea of blood? ![]() D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|