Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by NJ on Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:54 pm
Pics from a local gig on saturday, band from canberra called Kempsey.
i was using a friends 300d so the pics didnt turn out great lol, nah its because i didnt really know how it functioned so just put it on aperture priority and snapped away. fair bit of pp was done to make the reasonable... C&C more than welcome as always
thanks for looking
-

NJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: Ringwood, Melbourne
by poompy on Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:39 pm
hey nice photos, i really like the effect if you were going for that effect.
the third one is the pick of the lot for me.
-

poompy
- Member
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:41 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie
by NJ on Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:51 pm
thanks poompy
yeh i was going for an effect, not really sure what it was, probably the blurry background 
-

NJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: Ringwood, Melbourne
by mic on Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:59 pm
I like these,
Well done.
Mic 
-

mic
- Retired Egg Flipper
-
- Posts: 2167
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
- Location: Glen Waverly VIC
by NJ on Wed Sep 13, 2006 10:11 pm
thanks mic 
-

NJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: Ringwood, Melbourne
by owen on Wed Sep 13, 2006 10:16 pm
Hey NJ I think the third is the better image, however your selection is very noticeable and detracts from the image. Perhaps a better way to do it is to unselect everything, blur the entire image, and then just use a soft history brush perhaps on a reduced opacity to get some of the detail back, if you need a hand in doing this just let me know 
-

owen
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
- Location: Nowra, NSW
-
by NJ on Wed Sep 13, 2006 10:27 pm
thanks owen, yeh i can see now, im on a different monitor as to the one i did it one, looks crap ay! i'll fix it up later, as long as i know, everything is cool
thanks again.
edit: that is the method i used by the way, just did it too quickly 
-

NJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: Ringwood, Melbourne
by thelastname on Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:25 pm
I like the first and third pics. Great shot’s well done.
-
thelastname
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:01 pm
- Location: Warrnambool
by casnell on Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:32 am
I like #1, he stands out of the background well.
Chris
-

casnell
- Member
-
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 4:14 pm
- Location: Heidelberg/Melbourne
by adam on Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:39 am
I like all three!
Especially the ones with the Thinline Tele
I like it how, some of it is still (like the guitar, drums) and the rest like motioned blur! Very cool!
-

adam
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
- Location: New Caledonia
-
by PiroStitch on Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:03 am
the guitar shots are much better than the ones of the drummer.
don't forget band gig shots don't need to be super sharp. just portray the sense of movement which you've done and everything will be sweet 
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by stubbsy on Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:02 pm
Nathan
#1 for me. I like the colour treatment and the way the guitarist stands out well from the background. Very rock & roll 
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by marcotrov on Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:30 pm
Nathan #1 and #3 have a great feel to them. Lovely sense of movement and great tones.
cheers
marco
-
marcotrov
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia
by NJ on Thu Sep 14, 2006 5:26 pm
thanks everyone for the kind comments, i really appreciate it! 
-

NJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: Ringwood, Melbourne
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|