Click the image for a larger version.

Diving sequenceModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Diving sequenceSomething a bit different from me. This sequence of shots seemed to lend itself to some sort of treatment like this. I'm guessing this style of composition may not be to everyone's tastes. The images themselves were captured in a single burst using the D2x High speed crop mode.
Click the image for a larger version. ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
That looks fantastic Peter !!!!!
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
Peter - the upper sequence works a tad better than the bottom. The reason: the horizon in the upper set has continuity whereas the bottom is all over the place. Other than that a very nice example of fps
![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
I would love to learn how to present photos like that Peter. I have some series from the Bungendore rodeo on the weekend that would look great.
Is it a download? Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
This is a nice way of presenting a sequence, but something really bothered me about this. And it wasn't the broken horizon. I knew something was fundamentally wrong, but I couldn't put my finger on it...
After a while I realised that all the "chromes" on the strips where in portrait format, but not lying on their side...! Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
New Nikkor'chrome film?? in Portrait format??
![]() I thought the film would read "Lexar Colour 133x 4GB" or something similar.. ![]()
i had the same feeling. now i'm looking at it thinking it just looks all wrong after you pointed it out. Simon
www.colberne.com.au I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
Thank you all for your comments. Regarding the orientation of the image in the frame - I didn't even think about it.
Steve - I used the AutoFX FilmStrip effect - it's awkward to use and not cheap, but it does a great job. See HERE for samples and pricing on their web site Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Thanks Peter for that information
![]() Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
It's great for the purpose Nikon intended. If you want to capture any fast moving object it can be the difference between getting it and missing it. I don't use it heaps, but it HAS been useful. I haven't tried it for the purpose, but I'd say it would be great with motorsport or things like capturing marine animals breaking out of the water (whales, dolphins etc). Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|