Same model different coffee table

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Same model different coffee table

Postby Alex on Sat Dec 30, 2006 6:10 pm

Well, I'm back at it. Some of you may remember a shot I posted a couple of weeks ago:


http://www.dslrusers.com/viewtopic.php?t=23124&highlight=

I have revisited the setup in light of the comments I received. I bought a new coffee table so that the model can stretch out a bit looking more natural and I used a different (wider) lens which I purchased yesterday. I also got rid of the shoes. Your comments and critique are very welcome.

Image

Thanks

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Alpha_7 on Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:20 pm

Hey Alex,

Good to see your idea progressing, (BTW which lens did you pick up?).

The lighting hot spot on her far forearm is a little distracting (I also prefered the shoes..that or perhaps the toes curled or pointed so that only her heals are on the table). The flat foot on the coffee table isn't as appealing (that's just me). There is a little less thigh showing in this one.. (not sure if thats intentional) but its a little less provokative because of it and the slightly lessen detail in the silhouette.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Alex on Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:31 pm

Hi Craig,

Thanks for your comments. Yes, there is less detail in this one and it's more of a silhouette - I was aiming for that this time by keeping less detail in shadow. I think I prefer the lighting in the first one.

I picked up a mint condition 2nd hand Nikkor 20-35 f 2.8 D IF

Cheers
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Alpha_7 on Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:33 pm

Alex wrote:I picked up a mint condition 2nd hand Nikkor 20-35 f 2.8 D IF


oooh, Nice :) And I tend to agree I prefer the light more on the first (as a whole).
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Alex on Sat Dec 30, 2006 11:49 pm

Here is another one :-)

Image

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Critter on Sun Dec 31, 2006 11:50 am

I mean this comment seriously - is it possible to shoot this without a dress, or a more figure hugging dress perhaps? I admire your use of lighting (I certainly couldnt acheive what you have done!), but I find the wrinkles in the dress detract from the image...
Chris
D300 | D80 | 14-24 f/2.8 | 24-70 f/2.8 | 35 f/2 | 105VR f/2.8 | 18-200VR | SB600 | R1 | GP-1 |
User avatar
Critter
Member
 
Posts: 214
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Bardon, Brisbane

Postby Alex on Sun Dec 31, 2006 12:57 pm

Chris,

A very good point. Will take that into account when I shoot a new version of this.

Cheers
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby shutterbug on Sun Dec 31, 2006 7:16 pm

Agree with Chris, for the image to work you need the model to be naked or have her wear a swimsuit :wink:
User avatar
shutterbug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques

cron