High key lighting portraits

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

High key lighting portraits

Postby gooseberry on Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:48 am

A couple more with my experiments learning about lighting - I should crop the lower area more, but I was so chuffed the reflections came out that I left them in these final crops :razz:

#1
Image

#2
Image
User avatar
gooseberry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:18 pm
Location: Singapore

Postby colin_12 on Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:15 am

I like the reflections Gooseberry.
Regards Colin
User avatar
colin_12
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
Location: Hazelbrook

Postby garlino on Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:31 am

Really nice....

As colin said the reflections are great.

Care to tell us your lighting setup??? :D
garlino
Member
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:43 pm
Location: city, brisbane

Postby Geoff on Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:04 am

Nice work.
I'd be keen on seeing and learning about your setup too.
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Alex on Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:25 am

A vote from me too! Love the reflections and the lighting overall.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:35 am

Gooseberry - I can only reiterate what those before me have said.

#2 - this is a classic example pose that would have had superb impact if shot from a distance so that the model only appeared in 1/3rd of the photo and smaller. White space has a tremendous impact on the ”feel” of a photo and in this case would have given a ”lonely” approach to the whole image.
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby gstark on Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:36 pm

What Chris says about the second image is 110% correct.

Beyond that, the air of defiance, almost, that I'm getting from the model n thos shot also suggest to me that it will also work with a much tighter crop too, which makes this a really, reallly, realllly good image. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22924
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby gooseberry on Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:38 pm

Thanks all for the comments and feedback.

sirhc55 wrote:Gooseberry - I can only reiterate what those before me have said.

#2 - this is a classic example pose that would have had superb impact if shot from a distance so that the model only appeared in 1/3rd of the photo and smaller. White space has a tremendous impact on the ”feel” of a photo and in this case would have given a ”lonely” approach to the whole image.


gstark wrote:What Chris says about the second image is 110% correct.

Beyond that, the air of defiance, almost, that I'm getting from the model n thos shot also suggest to me that it will also work with a much tighter crop too, which makes this a really, reallly, realllly good image. :)


Chris and Gary,
Thanks for the feedback - yeah, I was toying with the idea of cropping closer or leaving it looser when I was reviewing the second shot. Think I'll post a wider version of that one with more white space to compare. Really appreciate your feedback and comments.


Oh, and for the setup, fairly simple - something reflective on the floor to create the reflection, one main light to light the model from the front and a couple of lights to light up and totally overexpose the background.
User avatar
gooseberry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 7:18 pm
Location: Singapore


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques