Strong Criticism Allowed

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Strong Criticism Allowed

Postby cascade on Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:30 am

Hi guys, this is my first post and I'd like to say I love your forum, exactly what I've been looking for. I bought my self a 400d twin lens kit recently and I'm keen to learn the art properly, with some help from you all hopefully.

I've got a couple of photos here I took which I'd like some input on. Please be harsh as I think the best way to learn is through some good constructive criticism. I've only got the kit lenses at the moment but I'll be updating them as soon as the budget allows.

Image

this is straight out of the camera

Image

Just added a bit of a highlight to it

Image

Cropped it a bit and played with the colouring a little

Image

Straight from the camera, untouched.

Hope it's not too many at once, thanks guys.
Last edited by cascade on Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:54 pm, edited 3 times in total.
cascade
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Berridale Hobart

Postby macka on Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:35 am

Hey mate, get rid of the ?v=0 bit from the end of your links, that might help.

Edit: Also they're a bit small to comment properly.

Cheers
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby cascade on Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:46 am

Sorry about the size, should be fixed now.
cascade
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Berridale Hobart

Postby macka on Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:02 am

Hey, I can see them now!

I find #1 a bit busy, and the diagonal mast(?) on the left hand side is a bit unfortunate. I can see why you went for a selecive de-sat in #2 to try and isolate your subject. Perhaps you could also try cropping or cloning out that diagonal as an alternative... Just a thought.

#3 is quite nice, and it works in a pano crop. You could probably do a bit of curves work to bring out the foreground a little more.

#4 is a bit soft - were you using a tripod? Nice colours though.

Oh, and welcome to the forum. :D

(NB: For the size, people usually post somewhere between 640 and 800 pixels on the long side)

Cheers,
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby cascade on Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:07 am

Thanks macka, that is the sort of stuff I'm looking for. I'll go and have another play and use your suggestions and I was using a tripod, guess I have a lot to learn.
cascade
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Berridale Hobart

Postby Nnnnsic on Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:33 am

This'll be like the three bears:

Imagine me with gold locks flowing from my otherwise freakish head

The first time, your images were too small!
Now, your images are too big!
But next time, they'll be jussssstttt riiiggghhhttt!!!

Seriously, try and go for a restriction of 800 pixels on any one side. Whether that means you go for (straight out of the camera example) something like 800x533 or 533x800, entirely your prerogative, but try to keep it to a max of 800 on one side.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby drifter on Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:04 am

I'm normally not a fan of selective colour/highlighs but i think its worked really well in your second shot .Apart from the blown out sign ,but it still looks cool .
Tony

Atheism is a non-prophet organisation.
User avatar
drifter
Member
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:37 pm
Location: Croydon -Sydney

Re: Strong Criticism Allowed

Postby !~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~! on Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:17 am

cascade wrote:I bought my self a 400d twin lens kit recently

:up:
Canon EOS 40D
Canon EOS 400D
50mm 1.8 EF
User avatar
!~DeViNe~DaRkNeSs~!
Member
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Essendon - MELBOURNE

Postby cascade on Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:55 pm

Well hopefully I got the size right this time, sorry guys on a bit of a learning curve here.
cascade
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Berridale Hobart

Postby Marvin on Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:14 pm

Hi Cascade and welcome to the forum.
There are some great reflections in number one but I also find the diagonal mast? very distracting. Not sure I like the treatment in number 2 as I found the boats and the reflections the most interesting part, but that is personal taste.
I think number 3 could be better with some different PP. I am certainly no expers, but it doesn't seem to have much "pop". I like the jetty leading into the picture.
Number 4 has some nice colours but the cars and the sign distract from the house. I think if you zoomed in and cropped the modern stuff it would be better. Also, I agree that using a tripod would have helped. It looks like a little bit of camera shake has occurred.
Nikon D7000
User avatar
Marvin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Back in the hot Riverland, SA.


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques