
Give me your views. Thanks.



Decisions, decisions...Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
24 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Decisions, decisions...One image - 3 treatments and I can't decide which gives the best results. So I figure many heads are better than one...
![]() Give me your views. Thanks. ![]() ![]() ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter, I prefer #3. The colours in #1 look oversaturated to me and #2 not saturated enough. There's no pleasing some people.
![]() Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Surely the answer is with you - you were there to see the scene, so ipso facto, you should be able to determine what the pic should look like
![]() Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
#3 for me, by a long shot. 1 and 2 are good in comparison. I like the say the removed color, draws the eye to the detail
I like the b/w version best, it is very complimentary to the geometric nature of the subject. And the conversion you've done there is very nice.
I would definitely straighten the image, though. I personally would also center it to make it symmetrical (but that's just me). Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
All of them.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
#2, but try bumping up the green a tad. The blues in #1 are just too strong, and offputting.
#3 is great, but I personally prefer this building in colour. ![]() *** When getting there is half the fun! ***
#3
A poll may have helped your cause here Peter ![]() Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Peter,
#3 for me as well and as mentioned earlier, I also would like to see it evenly balanced, so just trim a bit off the left. Cheers, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Thank you all for your comments so far.
As for the grass in #1 - I must have spent a good 20 minutes playing with the image trying to get just that part of the shot right since it was quite yellow in the raw file. Guess I may have overdone it a little. I also should mention that #2 had some odd processing - I used Nik Color Efex IR black and white filter on the colour image then faded the effect by about 50% to get the resultant image #3 is a PSCS quadtone conversion of #1 with some minor adjustments prior to the conversion to bring up the sky Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I myself prefer number 1, however toning the saturation down a bit (as already suggested) might look better.
What do you prefer Peter ? I'll guess....no. 3....?!?!? ![]() Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Well for those who were wondering - I trully couldn't decide between #1 and #3. I'm more than happy with #3 as originally shown, but have tweaked and recropped (and cloned a little
![]() Thanks everyone for your input. ![]() and for the trully curious - this is the original untouched image out of the camera and converted to jpeg. ![]() Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
24 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|