
Thanks for looking
Alex
ContemplationModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
ContemplationAnother shot I took last night while tinkering with the lighting setup.
![]() Thanks for looking Alex
techniclaly all good exposure skin tone
from the rrflection in the eye i can see the difusser and bounce card at the bottom good work but i cant tell what sort of difusser its either a rectangle softbox or soem kind of makeshift one id just comment on the framing of the image need more buffer space at the top crop ios too close to head for that composition Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
Hi Wendell,
Thanks for the comments. Two lights in this set-up plus a reflector from the below - your analysis is spot on. One is a self-made softbox approx. 30 cm on each side in size, positioned very close to the subject (just out of the frame). There is a stop difference between the lights to give more contrast to the tones. Cheers Alex
Alex,
Exposure, lighting, tonality and wb: all nailed. Composition and posing .... I'd love to see perhaps a tad more eye contact, and maybe a bit more head space. I'm not sure about the negative space on the right in this image: for me this might have been an image where portrait orientation may have been a better option, but again, this is your call, and I'm here to just throw my thoughts at you., for what they're worth. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Thanks so much for the comments, Gary.
I agree the composition is not that flash (no pun intended), I was more trying to see what I can do with my home lighting set-up, which consisted of two Nikon flashes and some self made light modifiers. Cheers Alex
Then you're well on the way in that regard. ![]() g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|