Here is a quick cut of a shot from today. love to get your feedback. today I tried to vary the lighting more throughout the shoot. get away from flat, lighting.
What do you think of this portrait?

today's portraits - C&C pleaseModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
today's portraits - C&C pleaseHello,
Here is a quick cut of a shot from today. love to get your feedback. today I tried to vary the lighting more throughout the shoot. get away from flat, lighting. What do you think of this portrait? ![]()
I quite like it. I think the only thing distracting to me is the hand looks very rigid... though it's probably not as she has her fingers resting on her arm.. just me being nit-picky I think.
Everything else to me looks fine ![]()
thanks, appreciate it! think they were sitting on the bangles...
I really like it - the eye contact is spot on ...
the only quibble I have is the PP you've done around the head - removing something in the background or stray hair??? Unfortunately, there is a 'smudge' or darkening where the PP took place which keeps on drawing my eye...... if you go back and clean it up, I'd love it even more ![]() Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams
http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
you got me, as I said, I quick edit, I normally blend PP of stray hairs. thanks for your feedback, mucho appreciatedo! ![]()
The lighting is nice and even on this one, Bruce. Apart from the rough clone job above her head Rel already pointed out, I do not have much to add.
Cheers Alex
Very nice portrait.... the only thing I'd like to see is the whitening of the teeth to match somewhere near the whites of the eyes.
To me they look a little yellow comparitively. All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
i think this is one of your best though tout images
framing is good and clean even the pose/expression is relaxed and clean although i think the lightign is pretty much flat regardless of what you tried to do even if the light is on the side or at the extrreme top bounce light from surrounds can flatten dont think the lightsource has been positioned in the right place to get the atypical hollywood lighting look you need to get looser with your experimentation and really throw away the math and technical stuff to get creative with lighting, just let go of all your conceptions and really move that light around then when you have a understanding of light you can re-introduce the math and all the technical stuff Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
thanks Wendell, you give solid feedback often, much appreciated! agree, I err on safety and technical rather than experimenting. I know this, and acknoledge it, as I get bored with what I am doing somehtings... I look forward to pushing myself to experiment more.
thanks Tony, agree, it was only a quick edit, will brighten teeth when do full PP later in the week. ![]()
its really not that hard even experimentign with 1 lightsource
there is an endless anount of examples even in 1950's golden age hollywood movies the lightign concepts are simple but classic study these scenes and the endless images of the 50's glamour and youll get an idea of lighting once you have these lighting concepts set in your mind you can perfect them with your technical knowledge but if technical gets in the way chuck it out and work on your artistic ideas even though they may yield non technial perfect results clue 11 'o' clock position no softbox hard light no reflector try that Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
more to come during the week ![]()
thanks for the tips. any good web references to these hollywood 50s glam images? or a few guru names I can google?
this is a good example
http://www.hollywoodpinup.com/fashion-1/image/10lizabeth.jpg or look up Jez Smith Australias top fashion phog hes lightshaping is beyond amazing he's my hero and at one point i did soem post production work for him on Autore magazine http://www.jezsmithphotography.com Wendell Levi Teodoro
My Agents Press - Getty Images Creative Rep - T.I.D. FashionID, DBP Productions & The Nest Agency My Book - Zeduce
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|