Airborne!!!

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Airborne!!!

Postby losfp on Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:06 pm

Had another crack at the footy this afternoon. Lovely time in the sun taking photos of the curtain-raiser game, followed by a surprisingly competent display by the home team.

I continued my never-ending experimentation today - these shots are all 1/800, f/6.3, Auto ISO. Matrix metering, nearest subject AF, continuous AF. D200, 70-200VR + 1.7 TC. Shooting in JPEG (large fine), which is something I haven't done in a LONG time.

Some things I will change for next time... I will go back to shooting RAW if possible as I just don't feel you can tweak the final image in JPEG with as much to work with as RAW, especially highlights and shadows. Vital when shooting in harsh lighting conditions - bright sunshine, deep shadows, fast action. I think 1/800 is not quite fast enough, particularly with my mediocre handholding technique. Far too many blurred shots, blurry footballs etc.

I might also tweak the setting that determines how quickly the AF tracks objects moving through the scene - I got way too many spoilt shots too, where an umpire or trainer or other players drifted into the frame.

I think I'm getting better at anticipating the action, but it is still VERY fast. I am just not experienced enough to track the action a lot of the time :( Having the zoom helps in that regard - start out wide, then zoom and pan at the same time. I can't help but wonder if that is contributing to the high percentage of non-keepers though. Obviously if you are not zooming, the AF doesn't have to keep up as much.

The shots look pretty good at web sizes, but look a tad soft at 100%. Next time (errrr... next season!) I might try it without the TC. The extra length is nice, but I know I can get sharper shots and slightly faster AF without it. Maybe save for the 300/2.8 VR ;)

Any thoughts? First shot is pretty much full frame, and the 2nd two are lightly cropped.

Image
Image
Image

Rest of the gallery from today is here - http://losfp.smugmug.com/gallery/3405947
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Postby Patrolman Pat on Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:27 pm

Great timing in all the shots, catching the players as they take the mark. They certainly look sharp enough for the web. The second and third shots would have been better if the players were facing the camera but obviously you can't control that as a spectator. The third one would be perfect front on. The rest of the gallery looks good too.
Patrolman Pat
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 12:35 am
Location: Sheidow Park SA

Postby Pehpsi on Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:09 pm

Yeah you did a great job. Haven't done sports before, and it looks very unpredictable..

Some top shots in your gallery also. Really like this one:

Image

ISO Auto worked out good too, judging by all the EXIF.

I've also tried shooting JPG once, didn't much care for it. RAW all the way :)
Nikon D70
12-24 DX, 18-70 DX, 70-200 VR

20" iMac Intel C2D
Aperture 2.1
PS CS3

http://www.jamesrobertphotography.com
User avatar
Pehpsi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:24 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney

Postby gasgasgas on Mon Sep 03, 2007 1:32 pm

I like the images you have there and can empathise with you on the ability to be in the right place at the right time for AFL. I'm off to Tassie in October to shoot a comp where 4 matches are played a day for 3 days spread over a week.

As the only photographer going that I'm aware of, I don't really have the luxury of shooting RAW as I just don't have the file storage capabilities.

At last year's comp, I shot almost 20,000 images for the week and that was only with 3 games a day!!! :shock:

Cheers
User avatar
gasgasgas
Member
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:09 pm
Location: Palm Beach, Gold Coast


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques

cron