Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by marc on Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:00 pm
A few test shots with my new 200-400VR.
Taken on it's fantastic min focus distance of 6.2 ft. With a slight crop.
These were taken in harsh midday sun, with the D300, WB set to Auto. Spot meter & tripod used.
Not sure what has caused the blue fringing (in 1 & 2) on the wingtips & stick? Any ideas?
Like the 300VR, I love the bokeh on these.
C & C most welcome
Cheers
Marc
1/125s f/16 ISO800 @400mm
1/13s f/22 ISO200 @400mm
1/200s f/7.1 ISO200 @400mm

Last edited by marc on Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
D4|D3S|D700+MB-D10| 14-24 |24-70|70-200 f/2.8 VRII|70-200 f/4 VR|80-400 AF-S|500VR|Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro|TC's 1.4,1.7E & 2.0III|SB 900
-

marc
- Member
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:20 pm
- Location: Laufen, Switzerland. D4, D3S, D700+MB-D10
-
by ATJ on Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:15 pm
Great shots with lots of detail.
I'm very jealous. We have stacks of dragonflies but they very rarely, if ever, land.
-

ATJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
-
by marc on Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:21 pm
ATJ wrote:Great shots with lost of detail.
I'm very jealous. We have stacks of dragonflies but they very rarely, if ever, land.
Very true Andrew.
I'm told if you have some water nearby (swimming pool, creek, etc) a couple of sticks/branches placed strategically helps?
Cheers
Marc
D4|D3S|D700+MB-D10| 14-24 |24-70|70-200 f/2.8 VRII|70-200 f/4 VR|80-400 AF-S|500VR|Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro|TC's 1.4,1.7E & 2.0III|SB 900
-

marc
- Member
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:20 pm
- Location: Laufen, Switzerland. D4, D3S, D700+MB-D10
-
by ATJ on Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:06 pm
marc wrote:I'm told if you have some water nearby (swimming pool, creek, etc) a couple of sticks/branches placed strategically helps?
We have an above ground "pool" which I have let go so it is now a haven for tadpoles (many hundred), pond skaters, water beetles and (unfortunately mozzies). I have also tried placing a few sticks around near and over the water. The only dragonfly that I have seen resting was in the front yard - way away from the pool. 
-

ATJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
-
by chrisk on Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:33 pm
damn me but aint that sharp as hell ! 
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
-

chrisk
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
- Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney
-
by gstark on Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:46 pm
ATJ wrote:I have also tried placing a few sticks around near and over the water.
That's why the Foxtel doesn't work properly. 
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by Matt. K on Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:22 pm
That's what you pay your money for. Slick. Sharp and bright.
Regards
Matt. K
-

Matt. K
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
-
- Posts: 9981
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: North Nowra
by Handlebars on Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:36 pm
Really really nice!
#3 is great, the colours are good, the background couldn't be better and they are crisp as it gets.
-

Handlebars
- Member
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:34 am
- Location: Wattle Grove, Perth
by Mal on Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:59 pm
I love the first one.
Could the blue on the wings could be due to the water reflection?
Mal I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
-

Mal
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:18 pm
- Location: Berowra, NSW.
-
by marc on Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:30 pm
Mal wrote:I love the first one. Could the blue on the wings could be due to the water reflection?
It wasn't taken over water.
And it's not from over sharpening either, as it's evident prior to any PP. 
D4|D3S|D700+MB-D10| 14-24 |24-70|70-200 f/2.8 VRII|70-200 f/4 VR|80-400 AF-S|500VR|Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro|TC's 1.4,1.7E & 2.0III|SB 900
-

marc
- Member
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:20 pm
- Location: Laufen, Switzerland. D4, D3S, D700+MB-D10
-
by Manta on Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:35 pm
Top shots Marc. I've used that lens and would love to have kept it! It's a cracker in skilled hands (unlike mine) and I can't wait to see more work when you've actually gotten used to it!

-

Manta
- Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
-
- Posts: 3815
- Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
- Location: Hamilton Qld
-
by colin_12 on Sun Jan 06, 2008 6:02 pm
This is great considdering that you had to be at least 6 feet away from your subject. Very clean.
Regards Colin
-

colin_12
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: Hazelbrook
by marc on Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:26 pm
colin_12 wrote:This is great considering that you had to be at least 6 feet away from your subject. Very clean. Regards Colin
6.2 feet to be exact.
Which is what makes it such a great lens, with macro capabilities. 
Last edited by marc on Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
D4|D3S|D700+MB-D10| 14-24 |24-70|70-200 f/2.8 VRII|70-200 f/4 VR|80-400 AF-S|500VR|Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro|TC's 1.4,1.7E & 2.0III|SB 900
-

marc
- Member
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:20 pm
- Location: Laufen, Switzerland. D4, D3S, D700+MB-D10
-
by stubbsy on Tue Jan 08, 2008 7:52 pm
Marc
These are very impressive - great DOF too.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|