Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Killakoala on Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:14 pm
The well known tourist landmark, Richmond Bridge at Richmond, Tasmania. Taken with Nikon D2H and 10.5mm Fisheye. (5 images 1 stop apart combined in Photomatix Pro.) Extra processing in PSCS is with Nik Colour effects Pro; Pro contrast to improve tone depth, polariser for richer blues and greens and skylight to add some warmth. Cropped for balance and sharpened at about 0.3 px and 144% to retain some detail. I think that HDR works well for this type of image. It might look a bit oversaturated, but that is what I wanted. I didn't want to overdo it though. Click on the image for larger view (x1200px) I figured it would look good with the Impressionist filter also. A good subject for this filter. If Monet had passed by here, maybe this is how he would have seen it. 
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by rcg on Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:23 pm
That type of filter really suits the image
-
rcg
- Member
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 3:50 pm
- Location: warrnambool
by johnd on Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:35 pm
Steve, I like the first one, but not so sure about the Monet look. Maybe I'm just not arty enough. The saturation is spot on IMHO. I've been photographing around Hobart for 3 years now and I've never taken a shot in Richmond. Note to self ... go to Richmond. I'm sure there is heaps of great HDR material, as you have just demonstrated. Cheers John
-

johnd
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
- Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.
-
by big pix on Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:43 pm
I like what has been achieved, and a good subject for the treatment......... but not a big fan of the over saturated blue
this image would look good printed on canvas......
Cheers ....bp.... Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
-

big pix
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
- Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
by sirhc55 on Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:30 pm
Excellent for both images Steve.
Chris -------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
-

sirhc55
- Key Member
-
- Posts: 12930
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
by dm_td5 on Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:16 pm
I like them both. I'd clone out the rocks on the left though. John, how can you not have pic's of Richmond 
D.M. - D200 12°11'34"S 136°46'24"E or there abouts
-

dm_td5
- Member
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:13 pm
- Location: Arnhem Land NT
by surenj on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:49 am
Great shot and edit... Can easily imagine it as a canvas print decorating a wall!!
-

surenj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
- Location: Artarmon NSW
by xerubus on Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:54 am
Hi Steve,
I usually despise HDR as when it is done incorrectly (more often then not) it has a cartoon comic look.
But this is outstanding and a very good example of how HDR should look! Also like the impressionist version, and would happily hang that on my wall.
Nicely done mate.
cheers
-Mark
-

xerubus
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2740
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
- Location: Nth Brisbane
-
by Ladybird on Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:55 pm
LOVE the impressionist!
I thought the first one was pretty darn good 'til I scrolled down.
Thanks heaps for sharing these ones!
I'll try to be a bit nicer, if you try to be a bit smarter.
-

Ladybird
- Member
-
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:01 pm
- Location: Brisbane, Queensland
by hyperhiryu on Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:45 pm
Great use of filters. Loving the colours!
-
hyperhiryu
- Newbie
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:31 am
- Location: Melbourne/Sydney
by Killakoala on Mon Mar 03, 2008 5:24 pm
Thanks for the nice comments everyone.
My intention when I post an image is to show what I have been experimenting with, but it's always nice to get a good critique for one's ego now and then.
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by who on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:48 pm
I like the image a lot, but not fussed on the fisheye inward tilt on the building. I was going to take some photos early last month when I stayed in Richmond, but after the wedding on Sat night I had no free card space - but I didn't miss any pics either....... dm_td5 wrote:John, how can you not have pic's of Richmond 
Tasmanian's don't travel well  A journey that distance would require an overnight stay 
Old D200+extras
-
who
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 543
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:38 pm
- Location: Ulverstone, TAS
by johnd on Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:53 am
Don't rush me, I'll get down to Richmond one day soon. It's a 40 minute drive so I'll have to take a cut lunch and other provisions. Besides, I don't have any free time in my weekend calendar until mid May.  Too many photographic engagements. Cheers John
-

johnd
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
- Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.
-
by digifrog on Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:10 pm
Well done that is a great rendition of the Richmond Bridge. HDR certainly is a can of worms ! 
D200, 17-55 f2.8, 50 f1.4, 80-200 2.8
-

digifrog
- Member
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:35 am
- Location: CBD, Hobart, Tasmania 7000
by obzelite on Wed Mar 05, 2008 3:26 pm
great shot, and i think if you hadn't of said it was hdr no-one would have known because the colours just look very saturated. velvia style saturated.
Simon
www.colberne.com.au
I purchased a Teddy Bear this morning for the sum of $10. I named him Mohammed. This afternoon I sold him on E-Bay for $30. My question is, "Have I made a prophet?"
-

obzelite
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 2:47 am
- Location: Willagee, WA - D90
-
by Killakoala on Wed Mar 05, 2008 6:00 pm
obzelite wrote:great shot, and i think if you hadn't of said it was hdr no-one would have known because the colours just look very saturated. velvia style saturated.
Interesting you should mention Velvia as I did shoot a few of some Velvia with my F5 as well but I think this one looks nicer. 
Steve. |D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.comLeeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
-

Killakoala
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5398
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Southland NZ
-
by libertyterran on Wed Mar 05, 2008 6:13 pm
1st photo doesn't look like HDR at all  . GJ on having the "perfect exposure". I actually like the 2nd photo than the 1st one.
-
libertyterran
- Member
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 12:28 am
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|